On 13-Aug-2009, at 06:15, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
7 days is imho not enough. IF users forget to look at it, I'd give
them at
leaast a month...
7 days seems to work pretty well. If users are desperate and willing
to contact an admin, the entire mailspool is duplicated and stored for
> On 12-Aug-2009, at 23:30, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 20:36 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>>> I find my users almost never look at the SPAM
>>> mailbox
>> There is an easy fix for that - take that facility away :-)
On 13.08.09 05:18, LuKreme wrote:
> I am tempted. the various
On 12-Aug-2009, at 23:30, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 20:36 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
I find my users almost never look at the SPAM
mailbox
There is an easy fix for that - take that facility away :-)
I am tempted. the various SPAM folders are more than half the mail
stor
LuKreme wrote:
Got quite a few emails today from users complaining about the huge
onslaught of SPAM into their mailboxes. One user in particular is used
to getting 2-5 email messages a day and logged in this morning to over
250 in the last 12 hours.
So, I investigated.
Ooops, I restarted sp
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 20:36 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> > I find my users almost never look at the SPAM
> > mailbox
On 13.08.09 06:30, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> There is an easy fix for that - take that facility away :-)
do you mean, take away spam filtering or the possibility to look at fa
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 20:36 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> I find my users almost never look at the SPAM
> mailbox
There is an easy fix for that - take that facility away :-)
Got quite a few emails today from users complaining about the huge
onslaught of SPAM into their mailboxes. One user in particular is used
to getting 2-5 email messages a day and logged in this morning to over
250 in the last 12 hours.
So, I investigated.
Ooops, I restarted spamd last night
