David Brodbeck wrote:
Kelson wrote:
Mail sent from to a few addresses that we never use for outgoing
mail is rejected with an Invalid bounce explanation. (Don't do this
with postmaster or abuse, or you'll probably end up listed on
RFC-ignorant.)
AFAIK you won't unless someone decides to report
I feel like I need to add, for the sake of others, that its a bad idea
to allow outside access to these two email addresses. Internal users,
or perhaps even just a few trusted individuals should be able to send
to these two addresses, but not the general internet population. I'm
guessing the
Hi All,
I have set up a spam/virus filtering gateway using the very popular
combination of ClamAV+Spamassassin+Amavisd-new+Postfix. As its still
in development, I'd like to do a slow roll-out to the users and have
them help train the database against spam. To this end, I've
considered setting
At 02:51 PM 9/23/2004, Gary Buckmaster wrote:
To this end, I've
considered setting up spam@ and notspam@ accounts on the gateway
itself, and having local users send appropriate samples to these
accounts, then running sa-learn against these. Does this approach
make a great deal of sense?
Only if
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:51:36 -0500, Gary Buckmaster wrote
considered setting up spam@ and notspam@ accounts on the gateway
itself, and having local users send appropriate samples to these
accounts, then running sa-learn against these. Does this approach
make a great deal of sense? Has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Buckmaster wrote:
| I have set up a spam/virus filtering gateway using the very popular
| combination of ClamAV+Spamassassin+Amavisd-new+Postfix. As its still
| in development, I'd like to do a slow roll-out to the users and have
| them help
David Brodbeck wrote:
You may want to restrict outside addresses from sending to those
accounts...well, at least the notspam one. It's occurred to me, after getting
a bunch of spam to web-scraped email addresses, that if I published the spam@
address in hidden text on our website the filter might
Kelson wrote:
Mail sent from to a few addresses that we never use for outgoing
mail is rejected with an Invalid bounce explanation. (Don't do this
with postmaster or abuse, or you'll probably end up listed on
RFC-ignorant.)
AFAIK you won't unless someone decides to report you. RFC-ignorant
