Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-08-24 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
> >>> There are spams hitting negative scoring rules e.g. MAILING_LIST_MULTI, >>> RCVD_IN_RP_*, RCVD_IN_IADB_* and they are constantly trained as ham. Just a reminder, if you ever receive spam which is tagged as RCVD_IN_IADB (or *any* flavour of IADB tag) *please* forward it to me personal

Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-08-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>On 08/08/2018 15:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>...of last 40 mail in my spambox, 14 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI >>...of last 100 mail in spambox, 27 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI On 09.08.18 08:54, Daniele Duca wrote: >I practically zeroed MAILING_LIST_MULTI the day it came in the >ruleset.

Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-08-09 Thread RW
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:35:21 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >On 08/08/2018 15:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >>...of last 40 mail in my spambox, 14 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI > >>...of last 100 mail in spambox, 27 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI > > On 09.08.18 08:54, Daniele Duca wrote

Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-08-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 08/08/2018 15:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: ...of last 40 mail in my spambox, 14 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI ...of last 100 mail in spambox, 27 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI On 09.08.18 08:54, Daniele Duca wrote: I practically zeroed MAILING_LIST_MULTI the day it came in the ruleset. I

Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-08-08 Thread Daniele Duca
On 08/08/2018 15:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: ...of last 40 mail in my spambox, 14 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI ...of last 100 mail in spambox, 27 matches MAILING_LIST_MULTI I practically zeroed MAILING_LIST_MULTI the day it came in the ruleset. I mean, since there's tflag "noautolearn

Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-08-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:49:04 +0200 >Daniele Duca wrote: >> In my current SA setup I use bayes_auto_learn along with some >> custom poison pills (autolearn_force on some rules) , and I'm >> currently wondering if over training SA's bayes could lead to the >> same "prejudice" problem as CRM114. >>

Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-07-26 Thread RW
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:36:19 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:49:04 +0200 > >Daniele Duca wrote: > >> In my current SA setup I use bayes_auto_learn along with some > >> custom poison pills (autolearn_force on some rules) , and I'm > >> currently wondering if over tra

Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-07-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:49:04 +0200 Daniele Duca wrote: In my current SA setup I use bayes_auto_learn along with some custom poison pills (autolearn_force on some rules) , and I'm currently wondering if over training SA's bayes could lead to the same "prejudice" problem as CRM114. I'm thinking th

Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-07-26 Thread RW
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:49:04 +0200 Daniele Duca wrote: > In my current SA setup I use bayes_auto_learn along with some custom > poison pills (autolearn_force on some rules) , and I'm currently > wondering if over training SA's bayes could lead to the same > "prejudice" problem as CRM114. > > I'

Re: Bayes overtraining

2018-07-25 Thread David Jones
On 07/25/2018 12:49 PM, Daniele Duca wrote: Hi, I'm evaluating incorporating CRM114 in my current setup and I was reading the FAQs about training the filter here: http://crm114.sourceforge.net/src/FAQ.txt What made me rethink my actual strategy were the following lines: ... If you train in

Bayes overtraining

2018-07-25 Thread Daniele Duca
Hi, I'm evaluating incorporating CRM114 in my current setup and I was reading the FAQs about training the filter here: http://crm114.sourceforge.net/src/FAQ.txt What made me rethink my actual strategy were the following lines: ... If you train in only on an error, that's close to the minima