Re: Central and common rules

2009-01-29 Thread Nigel Frankcom
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:51:13 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote: >Hi All, > >Is there are central point for links or dissemination of 'best >practice' rules? > >I freely admit this is my 1st port of call. > >I'm wondering if there is a simple (i.e works for a muppet like me) >page that lists details of

RE: Central and common rules

2009-01-29 Thread Bowie Bailey
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 16:55 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Yet Another Ninja wrote: > > > On 1/28/2009 10:22 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > > > > 90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net (from SARE) > > > > > > > > I haven't seen this rule set before. Is there any inform

Re: Central and common rules

2009-01-28 Thread mouss
Karsten Bräckelmann a écrit : > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:29 +0100, mouss wrote: > [...] >> you want to lookup "spammer.geocities.com" instead. for this, the domain >> "geocities.com" must be included in a list of such "exceptional" domains >> (domains for which 3 labels are kept instead of just 2.

Re: Central and common rules

2009-01-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:29 +0100, mouss wrote: [...] > you want to lookup "spammer.geocities.com" instead. for this, the domain > "geocities.com" must be included in a list of such "exceptional" domains > (domains for which 3 labels are kept instead of just 2. [The "2" in > util_rb_2tld is because

Re: Central and common rules

2009-01-28 Thread mouss
Bowie Bailey a écrit : > Yet Another Ninja wrote: >> On 1/28/2009 10:22 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: >>> mouss wrote: 90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net (from SARE) >>> I haven't seen this rule set before. Is there any information out >>> there about it? There doesn't seem to be anything on th

RE: Central and common rules

2009-01-28 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 16:55 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote: > Yet Another Ninja wrote: > > On 1/28/2009 10:22 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > > > 90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net (from SARE) > > > > > > I haven't seen this rule set before. Is there any information out > > > there about it? There do

RE: Central and common rules

2009-01-28 Thread Bowie Bailey
Yet Another Ninja wrote: > On 1/28/2009 10:22 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: > > mouss wrote: > > > 90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net (from SARE) > > > > I haven't seen this rule set before. Is there any information out > > there about it? There doesn't seem to be anything on the SARE > > rules pag

Re: Central and common rules

2009-01-28 Thread Yet Another Ninja
On 1/28/2009 10:22 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: mouss wrote: 90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net (from SARE) I haven't seen this rule set before. Is there any information out there about it? There doesn't seem to be anything on the SARE rules page. http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/90_2tld.

RE: Central and common rules

2009-01-28 Thread Bowie Bailey
mouss wrote: > > 90_2tld.cf.sare.sa-update.dostech.net (from SARE) I haven't seen this rule set before. Is there any information out there about it? There doesn't seem to be anything on the SARE rules page. -- Bowie

Re: Central and common rules

2009-01-28 Thread mouss
Nigel Frankcom a écrit : > Hi All, > > Is there are central point for links or dissemination of 'best > practice' rules? > > I freely admit this is my 1st port of call. > > I'm wondering if there is a simple (i.e works for a muppet like me) > page that lists details of how to synch non sa-update

Central and common rules

2009-01-27 Thread Nigel Frankcom
Hi All, Is there are central point for links or dissemination of 'best practice' rules? I freely admit this is my 1st port of call. I'm wondering if there is a simple (i.e works for a muppet like me) page that lists details of how to synch non sa-update rules. The question is based on the sad an