Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-27 Thread Loren Wilton
No, same scoring for subscribers/non-subscribers (not all lists on SourceForge are open lists). Just that each list has it's own personal Ok, you want to filter on postings to the list. Reasonable. You can't use List-Id header because it probably isn't there yet. Or if it is it could be

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-27 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 14:35:18 -0600: vetted? You can sign yourself up for most lists, if you have a valid address and a web browser. I didn't ever hear this word nor was it in my dictionary, that's why I asked. I got an offlist reply with an explanation,

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread jdow
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, I didn't get any responses on the MDF mailing list, so I was wondering if SA was the better angle to be coming at this with. I think we can help you, but it will depend on exactly what you want to do. SA normally is used to filter to mail for

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread Justin Mason
Philip Prindeville writes: Well, I didn't get any responses on the MDF mailing list, so I was wondering if SA was the better angle to be coming at this with. it's definitely something that has to be dealt with on the MDF end; SpamAssassin does allow it fine, but the caller has to implement

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread Philip Prindeville
Loren Wilton wrote: Well, I didn't get any responses on the MDF mailing list, so I was wondering if SA was the better angle to be coming at this with. I think we can help you, but it will depend on exactly what you want to do. SA normally is used to filter to mail for recipients. You

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 11:26:33 -0600: No, it's to a list. At the list exploder, we want to be able to apply certain per-list policies. For instance, for most lists (but not all), the following would be applicable: I don't use MimeDefang, but I guess it should be

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread Philip Prindeville
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 11:26:33 -0600: No, it's to a list. At the list exploder, we want to be able to apply certain per-list policies. For instance, for most lists (but not all), the following would be applicable: I don't use MimeDefang,

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread jdow
From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED] are fired... And you might have a specific set of rules for a list like alsa-devel (the 'L' in ALSA is for Linux, so it might be reasonable to assume that no one will be posting with charset='windows-1252'... it's also an English language list, so

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 13:32:10 -0600: Except that developers aren't vetted in any particular way. vetted? The spammer with time on his hands could subscribe himself... plus there's always the chance of a legitimate user's machine becoming infected with an email

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread Philip Prindeville
jdow wrote: From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED] are fired... And you might have a specific set of rules for a list like alsa-devel (the 'L' in ALSA is for Linux, so it might be reasonable to assume that no one will be posting with charset='windows-1252'... it's also an English

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread Philip Prindeville
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 13:32:10 -0600: Except that developers aren't vetted in any particular way. vetted? You can sign yourself up for most lists, if you have a valid address and a web browser. You have to try to get yourself

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread jdow
From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED] jdow wrote: From: Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED] are fired... And you might have a specific set of rules for a list like alsa-devel (the 'L' in ALSA is for Linux, so it might be reasonable to assume that no one will be posting with

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread Kelson
jdow wrote: (Otherwise - what in hell are the STD-XXX documents?) Good question... Medical test results for people who *ahem* perform in a certain film genre? -- Kelson Vibber SpeedGate Communications www.speed.net

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-26 Thread Jonas Eckerman
Kai Schaetzl wrote: I don't use MimeDefang, but I guess it should be possible to tell MD to use a specific configuration file when calling SA (depends on how it calls SA). Absolutely. Here's an example from our mimedefang-filter: ---8--- if ($is_result_query) { debug_log(2,spam:

Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-25 Thread Philip Prindeville
Well, I didn't get any responses on the MDF mailing list, so I was wondering if SA was the better angle to be coming at this with. Thanks, -Philip ---BeginMessage--- I was wondering... Since MdF can be used to invoke SA, and it can extract information from the headers such as a the envelope

Re: Crosspost: [Mimedefang] Using per-list SA policies

2006-05-25 Thread Loren Wilton
Well, I didn't get any responses on the MDF mailing list, so I was wondering if SA was the better angle to be coming at this with. I think we can help you, but it will depend on exactly what you want to do. SA normally is used to filter to mail for recipients. You seem to be talking about