Re: DMARC and mailing lists (was Re: IADB whitelist)

2017-12-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2017-12-26 18:49: have you never been subscribed to spammers' blacklist without your permission? On 26.12.17 19:01, Benny Pedersen wrote: hopefully apache.org does know how to handle spam you did not narrow your sentence on apache mailing lists, perhaps you

Re: DMARC and mailing lists (was Re: IADB whitelist)

2017-12-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2017-12-26 18:49: have you never been subscribed to spammers' blacklist without your permission? hopefully apache.org does know how to handle spam

Re: DMARC and mailing lists (was Re: IADB whitelist)

2017-12-26 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
RW skrev den 2017-12-26 18:05: I didn't receive any posts in "IADB whitelist" thread from the OP because they all failed DMARC with a reject policy. I found the posts on gmane. On 26.12.17 18:21, Benny Pedersen wrote: stop reject maillists no matter if dmarc fails have you never been

Re: DMARC and mailing lists (was Re: IADB whitelist)

2017-12-26 Thread Benny Pedersen
RW skrev den 2017-12-26 18:05: I didn't receive any posts in "IADB whitelist" thread from the OP because they all failed DMARC with a reject policy. I found the posts on gmane. stop reject maillists no matter if dmarc fails Posting to mailing lists with a domain using a strict DMARC policy

DMARC and mailing lists (was Re: IADB whitelist)

2017-12-26 Thread RW
I didn't receive any posts in "IADB whitelist" thread from the OP because they all failed DMARC with a reject policy. I found the posts on gmane. Posting to mailing lists with a domain using a strict DMARC policy is inherently risky because you are losing the redundancy of an aligned SPF pass