Skip wrote:
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, please bear with me as I do have a few more questions. In
this thread before, some people thought I should look at a possible
DNS problem, or perhaps my system is exceeding the daily threshold
for spamhaus. All they say at the spamhaus
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, please bear with me as I do have a few more questions. In
this thread before, some people thought I should look at a possible
DNS problem, or perhaps my system is exceeding the daily threshold
for spamhaus. All they say
@pelorus.org
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
X-Rcpt-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Skip wrote on Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:57:22 -0400:
I'm
pretty sure all they do is stop serving up web pages when you get a in
CPU exceeded situation. I don't think they'd turn off internal DNS
Skip wrote:
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, please bear with me as I do have a few more questions. In
this thread before, some people thought I should look at a possible
DNS problem, or perhaps my system is exceeding the daily threshold
for spamhaus.
I thought you guys would like a little humor. Here's what I sent my
host and what I got in response. *sigh*
Maybe tomorrow I'll have better luck with them.
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SITE: pelorus.org
ADDR: 68.231.250.115
Why would I be getting this on box106?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# host
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:58 -0400, Skip wrote:
I thought you guys would like a little humor. Here's what I sent my
host and what I got in response. *sigh*
Maybe tomorrow I'll have better luck with them.
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SITE: pelorus.org
ADDR: 68.231.250.115
Why would I be
At 14:58 21-07-2008, Skip wrote:
I thought you guys would like a little humor. Here's what I sent my
host and what I got in response. *sigh*
What response did you expect? :-)
Regards,
-sm
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:58 -0400, Skip wrote:
I thought you guys would like a little humor. Here's what I sent my
host and what I got in response. *sigh*
Maybe tomorrow I'll have better luck with them.
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SITE: pelorus.org
ADDR:
Skip wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, forget them. I am on my own again. I ran a few other
commands. What do you think of this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# host 2.0.0.127.yahoo.com
Host 2.0.0.127.yahoo.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]# host 2.0.0.127.google.com
Host 2.0.0.127.google.com
Wow, I wonder how I am going to convince Bluehost that they are having
issues.
What's the best way to disable individual RBL checks? I'm also
curious which tests you consider to be most effective on your system.
I was actually thinking the same thing about configuring SA to use a
Hi!
I was actually thinking the same thing about configuring SA to use a
different resolver, but could not find such a configuration option.
What is the generally approved way to disable individual RBL checks? I can
easily disable all of them, but I haven't figured out how to disable
But I want to stop the test from even being done at all. I guess I
should have included more of the previous post. Sorry :(
Skip
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
I was actually thinking the same thing about configuring SA to use a
different resolver, but could not find such a configuration
Hi!
But I want to stop the test from even being done at all. I guess I should
have included more of the previous post. Sorry :(
Just score the tests you want to disable 0.
Same answer, just score them 0.
Bye,
Raymond.
Skip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I want to stop the test from even being done at all. I guess I should
have included more of the previous post. Sorry :(
Please do not top-post (google if you are unfamiliar with the term). And as
already advised, just set score to 0 to disable individual
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Skip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I want to stop the test from even being done at all. I guess I should
have included more of the previous post. Sorry :(
Please do not top-post (google if you are unfamiliar with the term). And as
already advised, just set
Skip wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, please bear with me as I do have a few more questions. In this
thread before, some people thought I should look at a possible DNS
problem, or perhaps my system is exceeding the daily threshold for
spamhaus. All they say at the spamhaus FAQ is that if you exceed
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
[snip]
Anyway, please bear with me as I do have a few more questions. In
this thread before, some people thought I should look at a possible
DNS problem, or perhaps my system is exceeding the daily threshold
for spamhaus. All they say at the spamhaus FAQ is that
Skip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
try:
$ host 2.0.0.127.zen.spmahaus.org
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.4
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.10
2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org has address 127.0.0.2
BTW, what DNS server(s) are you using?
[...]
I got this:
$
Skip wrote:
I got this:
$ host 2.0.0.127.zen.spmahaus.org
Host 2.0.0.127.zen.spmahaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
That can't be good. I do not know what dns server we are using at
bluehost. I did a ps and searched for anything that looked like a dns
server, but couldn't find any. Sometimes
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I got this:
$ host 2.0.0.127.zen.spmahaus.org
Host 2.0.0.127.zen.spmahaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
^^^
I see the same thing.
Woops! We both just copypasted the same typo. :-) This should work:
Skip wrote on Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:19:07 -0400:
As for too many connection per day, my domain certainly does not
generate anywhere near the 100,000 connections spamhaus considers as the
cutoff, but I'll be my host (bluehost) does. If all they check is
originating IP address, then I'm sure
On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:31, Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Skip wrote on Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:19:07 -0400:
As for too many connection per day, my domain certainly does not
generate anywhere near the 100,000 connections spamhaus considers
as the
cutoff, but I'll be my host (bluehost)
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Skip wrote on Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:19:07 -0400:
As for too many connection per day, my domain certainly does not
generate anywhere near the 100,000 connections spamhaus considers as the
cutoff, but I'll be my host (bluehost) does. If all they check is
originating IP
Periodically I have seen spam come in my inbox and after reviewing the
headers, I'd see that it didn't hit any of the DNS/URL BL checks. So I
left SA running in debug mode for a while and saw some strange entries
(sorry for the long post here). Fortunately, these don't happen too
often, but
Skip wrote:
Periodically I have seen spam come in my inbox and after reviewing the
headers, I'd see that it didn't hit any of the DNS/URL BL checks. So I
left SA running in debug mode for a while and saw some strange entries
(sorry for the long post here). Fortunately, these don't happen too
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
Periodically I have seen spam come in my inbox and after reviewing
the headers, I'd see that it didn't hit any of the DNS/URL BL
checks. So I left SA running in debug mode for a while and saw some
strange entries (sorry for the long post here). Fortunately, these
Richard Frovarp wrote:
mouss wrote:
Skip wrote:
Periodically I have seen spam come in my inbox and after reviewing
the headers, I'd see that it didn't hit any of the DNS/URL BL
checks. So I left SA running in debug mode for a while and saw some
strange entries (sorry for the long post
27 matches
Mail list logo
