Discourage broken content (was: Broken images in mails)

2006-08-25 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, August 25, 2006 12:05 AM -0700 Plenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I disagree. To check out what happens I converted a JPG picture into a GIF file and sent it to myself. One time I converted it with IrfanView and the second time with PaintShop Pro. Both GIF files had the result "gift

Re: Discourage broken content (was: Broken images in mails)

2006-08-25 Thread John Andersen
On Friday 25 August 2006 11:20, Kenneth Porter wrote: > We need to stop giving a free pass to broken content creation software just > because it's popular. When someone sends you broken content, you should > react the same way you would if they sent you documents on dirt-smeared > paper. Stop lett

RE: Discourage broken content (was: Broken images in mails)

2006-08-25 Thread Kash, Howard \(Civ, ARL/CISD\)
> I think we should discourage all broken content in email and on the web. But who is to decide what is "broken". Just because giftext/giffix/gocr/etc. fail to parse it, doesn't necessarily mean it's broken. The software may be buggy (note the patches on the download page needed to make these

Re: Discourage broken content (was: Broken images in mails)

2006-08-25 Thread John Andersen
On Friday 25 August 2006 11:33, Kash, Howard (Civ, ARL/CISD) wrote: > > I think we should discourage all broken content in email and on the > > web. > > But who is to decide what is "broken". Just because > giftext/giffix/gocr/etc. fail to parse it, doesn't necessarily mean it's > broken. Yes,

RE: Discourage broken content (was: Broken images in mails)

2006-08-25 Thread Kash, Howard \(Civ, ARL/CISD\)
> Yes, by definition, it DOES mean its broken. So when then giftext author made an error in assuming every image would have a global colormap, he redefined the GIF specification so that any that don't are no longer valid? Howard

Re: Discourage broken content (was: Broken images in mails)

2006-08-25 Thread John Andersen
On Friday 25 August 2006 11:40, Kash, Howard (Civ, ARL/CISD) wrote: > > Yes, by definition, it DOES mean its broken. > > So when then giftext author made an error in assuming every image would > have a global colormap, he redefined the GIF specification so that any > that don't are no longer valid?

Discourage broken configs (was: Discourage broken content (was: Broken images in mails)

2006-08-25 Thread Gino Cerullo
On 25-Aug-06, at 3:20 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Friday, August 25, 2006 12:05 AM -0700 Plenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] online.de> wrote: I disagree. To check out what happens I converted a JPG picture into a GIF file and sent it to myself. One time I converted it with IrfanView and the second

Re: Discourage broken configs (was: Discourage broken content (was: Broken images in mails)

2006-08-25 Thread jdow
From: "Gino Cerullo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 25-Aug-06, at 3:20 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Friday, August 25, 2006 12:05 AM -0700 Plenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED] online.de> wrote: I disagree. To check out what happens I converted a JPG picture into a GIF file and sent it to myself. One time I

Re: Discourage broken configs (was: Discourage broken content (was: Broken images in mails)

2006-08-25 Thread George R . Kasica
>>> I think we should discourage all broken content in email and on the >>> web. >>> >>> At one time we could assume that broken content was an honest >>> mistake and make an attempt at fixing it. But with the rise of >>> malicious content attempting to exploit bugs in content handlers >>>