> -Original Message-
> From: Dhawal Doshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:54 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?
that should be DRBD
>
Or even geom_gate and geom_mirror on *BSD
Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:23 AM
>> To: Michael Scheidell
>> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?
&
Am 11.11.2006 um 11:47 schrieb Matt Kettler:
I suppose you could use something like NFS so that all systems share
the same DB, config files, etc.
NFS would be HIGHLY not -recommended.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/72362/
match=sql
In fact, I personally would
First, a thank you all for the suggestions relating to SQL. It seems SQL
support is better than I expected and I will give it a try.
Alex Woick wrote:
> Don't overrate Bayes.
The system has been running without Bayes for roughly 3 years (with
incremental Spamassassin updates), and with good res
Don't overrate Bayes. Don't focus solely on a bullet-proof highly
available clustered or replicated database. If the Bayes database is
gone, only one check is gone! All the others are still there.
For my mail content, the real filtering power today come from the
network checks such as url-bloc
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:23 AM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?
> Actually his point wasn't the SQL clus
Dhawal Doshy wrote:
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Do you see additional options?
Use a SQL server backend. If you must have a no-failure option for the
bayes DB, use a cluster of SQL servers.
[..]
Also see the SQL readme:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/
Charlie Clark wrote:
>
> Am 11.11.2006 um 10:48 schrieb Matthias Leisi:
>
>>
>> I already took a look at using SQL, but this quote:
>>
>> | NB: This should be considered BETA, and the interface, schema, or
>> | overall operation of SQL support may change at any time with future
>> | releases of SA
Matthias Leisi wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Do you see additional options?
Use a SQL server backend. If you must have a no-failure option for the
bayes DB, use a cluster of SQL servers.
[..]
Also see the SQL readme:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeBayes
I al
Am 11.11.2006 um 10:48 schrieb Matthias Leisi:
I already took a look at using SQL, but this quote:
| NB: This should be considered BETA, and the interface, schema, or
| overall operation of SQL support may change at any time with future
| releases of SA.
stops me from using it. Unfortunatel
Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matthias Leisi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 4:48 AM
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?
>>
>>
>>
&g
Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>
>>> Do you see additional options?
>>>
>> Use a SQL server backend. If you must have a no-failure option for the
>> bayes DB, use a cluster of SQL servers.
>> [..]
>>
>> Also see the SQL readme:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Be
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthias Leisi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 4:48 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?
>
>
>
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
> >> Do you see
Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Do you see additional options?
> Use a SQL server backend. If you must have a no-failure option for the
> bayes DB, use a cluster of SQL servers.
> [..]
>
> Also see the SQL readme:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeBayes
I already too
Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> How would you set up a "distributed" Bayes DB?
>
> In this context, "distributed" means that I have four mailserver
> machines in parallel (all with equal MX priority) where I want to run
> Spamassassins Bayes filter
Hello List,
How would you set up a "distributed" Bayes DB?
In this context, "distributed" means that I have four mailserver
machines in parallel (all with equal MX priority) where I want to run
Spamassassins Bayes filtering -- without introducing a single point of
failure (e
16 matches
Mail list logo