RE: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Dhawal Doshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:54 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB? that should be DRBD > Or even geom_gate and geom_mirror on *BSD

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Scheidell wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:23 AM >> To: Michael Scheidell >> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB? &

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 11.11.2006 um 11:47 schrieb Matt Kettler: I suppose you could use something like NFS so that all systems share the same DB, config files, etc. NFS would be HIGHLY not -recommended. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/72362/ match=sql In fact, I personally would

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Matthias Leisi
First, a thank you all for the suggestions relating to SQL. It seems SQL support is better than I expected and I will give it a try. Alex Woick wrote: > Don't overrate Bayes. The system has been running without Bayes for roughly 3 years (with incremental Spamassassin updates), and with good res

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Alex Woick
Don't overrate Bayes. Don't focus solely on a bullet-proof highly available clustered or replicated database. If the Bayes database is gone, only one check is gone! All the others are still there. For my mail content, the real filtering power today come from the network checks such as url-bloc

RE: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:23 AM > To: Michael Scheidell > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB? > Actually his point wasn't the SQL clus

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Dhawal Doshy
Dhawal Doshy wrote: Matthias Leisi wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: Do you see additional options? Use a SQL server backend. If you must have a no-failure option for the bayes DB, use a cluster of SQL servers. [..] Also see the SQL readme: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Matt Kettler
Charlie Clark wrote: > > Am 11.11.2006 um 10:48 schrieb Matthias Leisi: > >> >> I already took a look at using SQL, but this quote: >> >> | NB: This should be considered BETA, and the interface, schema, or >> | overall operation of SQL support may change at any time with future >> | releases of SA

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Dhawal Doshy
Matthias Leisi wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: Do you see additional options? Use a SQL server backend. If you must have a no-failure option for the bayes DB, use a cluster of SQL servers. [..] Also see the SQL readme: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeBayes I al

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 11.11.2006 um 10:48 schrieb Matthias Leisi: I already took a look at using SQL, but this quote: | NB: This should be considered BETA, and the interface, schema, or | overall operation of SQL support may change at any time with future | releases of SA. stops me from using it. Unfortunatel

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Matt Kettler
Michael Scheidell wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Matthias Leisi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 4:48 AM >> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB? >> >> >> &g

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB? (SQL usage)

2006-11-11 Thread Matt Kettler
Matthias Leisi wrote: > Matt Kettler wrote: > > >>> Do you see additional options? >>> >> Use a SQL server backend. If you must have a no-failure option for the >> bayes DB, use a cluster of SQL servers. >> [..] >> >> Also see the SQL readme: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Be

RE: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Michael Scheidell
> -Original Message- > From: Matthias Leisi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 4:48 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB? > > > > Matt Kettler wrote: > > >> Do you see

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Matthias Leisi
Matt Kettler wrote: >> Do you see additional options? > Use a SQL server backend. If you must have a no-failure option for the > bayes DB, use a cluster of SQL servers. > [..] > > Also see the SQL readme: > > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeBayes I already too

Re: "Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Matt Kettler
Matthias Leisi wrote: > Hello List, > > How would you set up a "distributed" Bayes DB? > > In this context, "distributed" means that I have four mailserver > machines in parallel (all with equal MX priority) where I want to run > Spamassassins Bayes filter

"Distributed" Bayes DB?

2006-11-11 Thread Matthias Leisi
Hello List, How would you set up a "distributed" Bayes DB? In this context, "distributed" means that I have four mailserver machines in parallel (all with equal MX priority) where I want to run Spamassassins Bayes filtering -- without introducing a single point of failure (e