On Dec 28, 2016, at 3:01 AM, Lukas Erlacher wrote:
> I'm calling "spamc --learntype=spam/ham" from a script, passing in emails
> fetched from imap (I'm using ISBG with --learnspambox / --learnhambox and
> --spamc actually).
Why are you calling spamc instead of sa-learn?
--
Apple broke AppleSc
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:39:52 +0100
Lukas Erlacher wrote:
> On 12/28/2016 03:12 PM, RW wrote:
> >
> > It's done in spamd. Don't attempt to remove X-Spam-* headers
> > yourself or it wont attempt to remove the mime encapsulation.
> >
>
> I'd like to convince myself of that... I ran `sudo -u debian
On 12/28/2016 03:12 PM, RW wrote:
It's done in spamd. Don't attempt to remove X-Spam-* headers yourself
or it wont attempt to remove the mime encapsulation.
I'd like to convince myself of that... I ran `sudo -u debian-spamd spamc
-c < spamspam.eml` on a mail that has spamlevel 14.4 and is en
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:01:05 +0100
Lukas Erlacher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesInSpamAssassin says:
>
> > It's OK to feed emails with Spamassassin markup into the sa-learn
> > command -- sa-learn will ignore any standard Spamassassin headers,
> > and if the origi
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 11:01 +0100, Lukas Erlacher wrote:
> I haven't found any documentation that specifies this for
> spamc/spamd.
>
I don't think that passing an email to SA via spamc makes any attempt
to strip pre-existing SA headers, but there's an easy way to check:
Find any message that ha
Hello,
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesInSpamAssassin says:
It's OK to feed emails with Spamassassin markup into the sa-learn command --
sa-learn will ignore any standard Spamassassin headers, and if the original
email has been encapsulated into an attachment it will decapsulate the
