Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:02 PM +0100 Justin Mason <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > This is just in the dev ruleset -- for 3.3.0 -- so you're best off adding >> it manually. right now it's like this: >> >> #

Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

Kenneth Porter writes: > On Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:02 PM +0100 Justin Mason <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > This is just in the dev ruleset -- for 3.3.0 -- so you're best off adding > > it manually. right now it's like this: > > > > # thanks to Phil Randal on the users list for

Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

On Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:02 PM +0100 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is just in the dev ruleset -- for 3.3.0 -- so you're best off adding it manually. right now it's like this: # thanks to Phil Randal on the users list for this tip rawbody __PR_TD_NOWRAP // m

Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

RobertH writes: > > ok, the rule-QA results are in: > > > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20080916-r695772- > > n&rule=%2FTD_NOWRAP&srcpath=rulesrc%2Fsandbox%2Fjm%2F20_basic&g=Change > > > > MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE > > 0.0 0.1669 0.

RE: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

> > > ok, the rule-QA results are in: > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20080916-r695772- > n&rule=%2FTD_NOWRAP&srcpath=rulesrc%2Fsandbox%2Fjm%2F20_basic&g=Change > > MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE > 0.0 0.1669 0. 1.0000.770.01

Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

t; > Phil > > -- > Phil Randal > Networks Engineer > Herefordshire Council > Hereford, UK > > -Original Message- > From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 September 2008 18:39 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Erro

RE: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

--On Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:16 AM +0100 "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I should make clear that PR_TD_NOWRAP does hit some ham here, so perhaps it would be better named __PR_TD_NOWRAP. What sources the ham that hits? What legitimately stuffs that string in email? Is it l

Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

erefordshire Council > Hereford, UK > > -Original Message- > From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 September 2008 18:39 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject > > --On Monday, September 15, 2008 10:3

RE: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

271, over 250 ham Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal Networks Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Kenneth Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 September 2008 18:39 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject --On

Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

RobertH writes: > > > > Cool! I've added it as a test rule in my environment and will bump up the > > score once I see how it goes. > > > > For others looking for the rule, see here: > > > > > .cf?revision=695394&view=

RE: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

--On Monday, September 15, 2008 1:26 PM -0700 RobertH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are these rules we can keep there indefinitely, or do they get migrated into future SA releases and should be removed? Also, I notice on SA 3.2.5 there were several linting issues. Ill look closer at the warnings

RE: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

> > Cool! I've added it as a test rule in my environment and will bump up the > score once I see how it goes. > > For others looking for the rule, see here: > > .cf?revision=695394&view=markup> > Are these rules we ca

Re: Erroneous doubled letters in subject

--On Monday, September 15, 2008 10:36 AM +0100 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: good tip! I've just added PR_TD_NOWRAP and PR_TD_NOWRAP_BAT to test these out... Cool! I've added it as a test rule in my environment and will bump up the score once I see how it goes. For others lookin