On 25/10/2018 14:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25/10/2018 11:43, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25/10/2018 10:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
bug number would help more...
On 25.10.18 10:58, Reio Remma wrote:
The bug contains no additional info. :) I was simply asked to post
to th
On 25/10/2018 11:43, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25/10/2018 10:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
bug number would help more...
On 25.10.18 10:58, Reio Remma wrote:
The bug contains no additional info. :) I was simply asked to post
to the list.
and this is exactly why it would be better
On 25/10/2018 11:43, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 25/10/2018 10:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
bug number would help more...
On 25.10.18 10:58, Reio Remma wrote:
The bug contains no additional info. :) I was simply asked to post to
the list.
and this is exactly why it would be better
On 22.10.18 21:34, Reio Remma wrote:
I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these
three rules.
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority
* 2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_NO_SUBJ From name in message + shor
On 25/10/2018 10:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 22.10.18 21:34, Reio Remma wrote:
I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these
three rules.
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority
* 2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject
* 2
On 22.10.18 21:34, Reio Remma wrote:
I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these three rules.
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority
* 2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_NO_SUBJ From name in message + short
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, Reio Remma wrote:
Hello!
I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these three
rules.
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority
* 2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_NO_SUBJ From name in me
Hello!
I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these three rules.
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority
* 2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_NO_SUBJ From name in message + short or no subject
If it wasn't f