On 22.10.18 21:34, Reio Remma wrote:
I have this perfectly legit mail that has a +7.5 score from these
three rules.
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_XPRIO From name in message + X-Priority
* 2.5 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ Has X-Priority header + short subject
* 2.5 FRNAME_IN_MSG_NO_SUBJ From name in message + short or no subject
If it wasn't for the -1.9 from Bayes and -2.6 from TxRep, it would
have been thrown away.
Should these XPRIO/FRNAME rules stack like this?
The e-mail in question is available here:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5607
On 25/10/2018 10:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
bug number would help more...
On 25.10.18 10:58, Reio Remma wrote:
The bug contains no additional info. :) I was simply asked to post to
the list.
and this is exactly why it would be better to post the link to the bug, or
at least the bug number, instead of just link to the attachment...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux - It's now safe to turn on your computer.
Linux - Teraz mozete pocitac bez obav zapnut.
