On 2017-02-17 (14:51 MST), David Jones wrote:
>
>> From: @lbutlr
> .Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 3:41 PM
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>
>> On 2017-02-16 (07:21 MST), David Jones wrote:
>>>
Hi,
>> I am using Postfix and cluebringer does looks pretty slick
>> so I will check into that.
Is that policyD?
http://wiki.policyd.org/start
It looks helpful, but hasn't had any development in at least two years.
Thanks,
Alex
On Friday 17 Feb 2017 at 21:51, David Jones wrote:
> Not all compromised accounts these days blast out at a high rate like we
> used to see years ago.
True, but also, some still do.
> I have had a few sneaky ones recently trickle spam through to stay below
> the radar so rate-limiting is not the
>From: @lbutlr
.Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 3:41 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>On 2017-02-16 (07:21 MST), David Jones wrote:
>>
>>> From: Christian Grunfeld
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 20
On 2017-02-16 (07:21 MST), David Jones wrote:
>
>> From: Christian Grunfeld
>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 7:50 AM
>> To: Spamassassin List
>> Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>
>> Are you using postfix as MTA? I use cluebringer suite which
>&
Am 16.02.2017 um 11:07 schrieb David Jones:
> My mail filters also do a lot of outbound relaying from hundreds
> of customer mail servers. Compromised accounts happen and I
> have some methods for detecting most of them and block the
> sender at the MTA within a few minutes to prevent my server
>
>From: Reindl Harald
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:55 AM
>To: David Jones; Spamassassin List
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
Am 16.02.2017 um 15:49 schrieb David Jones:
>> From: Christian Grunfeld
>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:29 AM
>> To
>From: Dianne Skoll
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:30 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:07:46 +
>David Jones wrote:
>> Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
>> rul
2017-02-16 11:49 GMT-03:00 David Jones :
>
>
> Many of the SMTP sending software that my customers
> use are not full MTAs with queuing capabilities so some email
> would be lost if I rate limited. I also have stupid mail sending
> devices like scanners/copiers that could get lumped in with
> oth
>From: Christian Grunfeld
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:29 AM
>To: Spamassassin List
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>Why not rate limiting? I think everyone is doing itI do...
> Cluebringer quotas can track one to one, one to many and
>many to one (botnet
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:07:46 +
David Jones wrote:
> Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
> rules for checking the To: header or could the FreeMail plugin
> be extended to add new rules like FREEMAIL_TO?
The To: header may not contain useful information. I don't think
the
ary 16, 2017 7:50 AM
> >To: Spamassassin List
> >Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>
> >Are you using postfix as MTA? I use cluebringer suite which
> >has a lot of functionality (spf checks, helo checks, greylist
> >and quotas)
>
> I am using Postfix and cl
>From: Christian Grunfeld
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 7:50 AM
>To: Spamassassin List
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>Are you using postfix as MTA? I use cluebringer suite which
>has a lot of functionality (spf checks, helo checks, greylist
>and quotas)
I
gt; >Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:54 AM
> >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>
> >On 02/16/2017 11:07 AM, David Jones wrote:
> >> Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
> >> rules for checking
>From: Axb
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:54 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>On 02/16/2017 11:07 AM, David Jones wrote:
>> Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
>> rules for checking the To: h
On 02/16/2017 11:07 AM, David Jones wrote:
Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
rules for checking the To: header or could the FreeMail plugin
be extended to add new rules like FREEMAIL_TO?
To block outbound bursts using SA is probably the most inneficient method.
Fai2ban i
My mail filters also do a lot of outbound relaying from hundreds
of customer mail servers. Compromised accounts happen and I
have some methods for detecting most of them and block the
sender at the MTA within a few minutes to prevent my server
IPs from becoming listed on RBLs.
Customer mail serve
Tim Densmore wrote on Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:06:52 -0700:
> I take it that outbound filtering isn't something many people do. Does
> anyone have any pointers at all for this sort of thing?
Take a look at MailScanner. It scans in and out and up and beyond.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get
che.org
Subject: RE: Filtering outbound mail?
Tim Densmore wrote:
> I take it that outbound filtering isn't something many people do.
> Does anyone have any pointers at all for this sort of thing? Should
> I report back to the person who tasked me with this that this idea is
> essent
Tim Densmore wrote:
> I take it that outbound filtering isn't something many people do.
> Does anyone have any pointers at all for this sort of thing? Should
> I report back to the person who tasked me with this that this idea is
> essentially a non-starter?
Try MIMEDefang instead of spamass-mil
er Mesa Telecom
Santa Fe Headquarters
Tel: 505-988-9200
Local Contact Numbers
-Original Message-
From: Tim Densmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 5:38 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Filtering outbound mail?
Hi folks,
I was wondering if an
Hi folks,
I was wondering if anyone knew of an effective way to filter outbound mail
for spam before it leaves. We're running spamassassin (well, spamd),
sendmail, and spamass-milter. The mail I've tested is being tagged
effectively, but I'm not sure how to then filter it. I've looked at
mailav
It is tempting to avoid filtering outbound mail (with SA or other). I am
assuming that outbound mail is legitimate (users are honest, and logs
can be used to look for abnormal behaviour and punish the guilty).
Now my question. Wouldn't that weaken Bayes filtering? I see two views:
23 matches
Mail list logo
