FreeBSD is committed to keeping the most up to date, current versions of
all major software packages and utilities. We need your help in doing this.
Any FreeBSD users, with ports experience, who use the Japanese version
of SpamAssassin:
We need someone to adopt that port, move it to a slave
Official port for SpamAssassin 3.3.2 posted.
Freebsd users can update their ports tree and upgrade to the current
3.3.2 version of SpamAssassin.
All current Freebsd versions are supported. If you have any problems
with Freebsd portions of the port, please open a pr so we can track it.
If yo
Not officially released yet, so consider this RC quality. ports committers
always make minor changes before committing the port update.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=144911
it incorporates the DKIM.pm patch to add back in unwhitelist_dkim
the pkg-install will try to ask you to in
oaded the patch files for the SA 3.30 FreeBsd port.
>> It has been tested on 7.1 amd64 and i386.
>
> What's the status? Looks to me like the port was pulled at your request?
>
> <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143582>
>
>
>
>
--
View this me
On 5-Feb-2010, at 08:38, Michael Scheidell wrote:
I have uploaded the patch files for the SA 3.30 FreeBsd port.
It has been tested on 7.1 amd64 and i386.
What's the status? Looks to me like the port was pulled at your request?
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143582>
I have uploaded the patch files for the SA 3.30 FreeBsd port.
It has been tested on 7.1 amd64 and i386.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=143582
>Category: ports
>Responsible:freebsd-ports-bugs
>Synopsis: MAINTAINER UPDATE mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin update
I am the official Freebsd ports maintainer for SA.
I have RC1 of the Freebsd port ready for testing. post request here.
note: everything is up for changing as I test. looks like it installs
on 7.1, amd64, perl 5.8.9.
Looking to test perl 5.8.8, 5.10.0, threaded perl 5.10.0, i386, 7.2 and
scan times when looking at debug times.
The Freebsd port system has the p5-Mail-DKIM port upgraded to .30.1 now,
and all Freebsd SpamAssassin users are encouraged to upgrade.
The following commands will update your ports system and p5-Mail-DKIM port.
#portsnap fetch update
#portupgrade p5-Mail
Hi
It works fine on several Freebsd 5.x i386 machines. sa-compile works
too. No problem so far after a few million scans. Thank you. I will try
your updated version for amd64 at the end of this week.
Regards,
Thomas
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> If anyone wants a 'pre release' of the Freebsd sa 3
> (now if we could decide how to fix/check umask.
> No real way of knowing if it's a install/reinstall,
> Only flag is during portupgrade I think.
I see, I thought the ports Makefile explicitly makes these
directories if missing, but now I see the perl makefile does it:
...
Installing /usr/lo
> > > +.if ${ARCH} == "i386"
> > > +.endif
> > Please don't do that!
>
> Both of the following cc commands need option -fPIC in order
> to be able to build a shareable library:
>
> gcc -fPIC -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE spamc/libspamc.c
> spamc/utils.c -o spamc/libspamc.so -shared
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack L. Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:29 AM
> To: Michael Scheidell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Freebsd Port of SA 3.2.1
>
> At
> > > I am using FBSD-6.2 amd64 and ran into this problem when running make:
> > > bunch of other stuff all okay
> > > stopped here:
> > > Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry.3
> > > make -f spamc/Makefile spamc/libspamc.so
> > > gcc -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/ma
Michael,
> > I am using FBSD-6.2 amd64 and ran into this problem when running make:
> > bunch of other stuff all okay
> > stopped here:
> > Manifying blib/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry.3
> > make -f spamc/Makefile spamc/libspamc.so
> > gcc -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach
Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 10:47 PM 6.12.2007 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
If anyone wants a 'pre release' of the Freebsd sa 3.2.1 portfile, you
can download it here:
http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa321.tgz
Instructions: rm everything in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin,
untar above t
At 10:47 PM 6.12.2007 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>If anyone wants a 'pre release' of the Freebsd sa 3.2.1 portfile, you
>can download it here:
>
>http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa321.tgz
>
>Instructions: rm everything in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin,
>untar above there, make or portup
If anyone wants a 'pre release' of the Freebsd sa 3.2.1 portfile, you
can download it here:
http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa321.tgz
Instructions: rm everything in /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin,
untar above there, make or portupgrade it.
Some dependencies that have not been committed to
Michael Scheidell writes:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:55 AM
> > To: Michael Scheidell
> > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: p
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:55 AM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: pre-release of SA 3.18_2 Freebsd port
>
>
&g
Michael Scheidell writes:
> Fixes several issues:
> #1, on FreeBSD 6.2:
>
> SpamAssassin Bug 5313: spamd error: 'prefork: select returned -1!
> recovering: Bad file descriptor'
> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5313
>
> Patches backported from 3.20rc3 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixes several issues:
#1, on FreeBSD 6.2:
SpamAssassin Bug 5313: spamd error: 'prefork: select returned -1!
recovering: Bad file descriptor'
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5313
Patches backported from 3.20rc3 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#2, fix sa-update directory to be consist
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 01:21:19PM -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast
module? I can create it if you like.
(I haven't been able to fin
--On Saturday, September 25, 2004 12:47:20 -0400 David Brodbeck <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
And, just as a note, the latest ExiScan is 27, for Exim 4.42.
Is that in the ports tree yet? I know they've been under a freeze
for a while now.
Yep, that's the current port versions.
-Pat
+-le 25/09/2004 13:21 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin écrivait :
| On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
|
| Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast
| module? I can create it if you like.
|
| (I haven't been able to find a useful documentation on creating
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
Does this mean we're going to get/need a port in for the IP::Country::Fast
module? I can create it if you like.
(I haven't been able to find a useful documentation on creating a port 00
is there one?)
A menu-based config (like the one for the mod_php)
+-le 25/09/2004 02:20 -0700, Pat Lashley écrivait :
| --On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> +-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit :
|>| SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update
|>| to the existing SA port;
Pat Lashley wrote:
For example, it would break the Exim port which by
default includes the ExiScan patches. (The Exim port would still
build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.)
Sure about that? I'm running Exim with Exiscan version 22, built from
the port, and it's working fin
--On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
+-Le 24/09/2004 18:20 -0700, Pat Lashley a dit :
| SA 3.0 should probably be a separate port rather than an update
| to the existing SA port; due to the lack of backwards compatability
| in the API. For exa
--On Saturday, September 25, 2004 00:21:44 -0400 David Brodbeck <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example, it would break the Exim port which by
default includes the ExiScan patches. (The Exim port would still
build; but the SpamAssassin support would fail at run time.)
Sure about that? I'm running
--On Friday, September 24, 2004 04:37:05 -0400 "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've gotten a Makefile mostly tuned for sa3, based on the
FreeBSD port makefile for 2.64. I've added most of the
dependencies, but FreeBSD doesn't have ports for
At 04:37 AM 9.24.2004 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>I've gotten a Makefile mostly tuned for sa3, based on the FreeBSD port
>makefile for 2.64. I've added most of the dependencies, but FreeBSD
>doesn't have ports for Net::SMTP or IP::Country::Fast, so those
I've gotten a Makefile mostly tuned for sa3, based on the FreeBSD port
makefile for 2.64. I've added most of the dependencies, but FreeBSD
doesn't have ports for Net::SMTP or IP::Country::Fast, so those two
features can't be auto-installed unless the ports maintainer comes
I am working on creating a drop-in replacement for the FreeBSD port,
although it is likely the committers will create their own in due time.
-Dan
--
I want to see how you see.
-SK, 6/2/99, 4:30 AM
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144
33 matches
Mail list logo
