Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-25 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:26:38 -0500 Alex wrote: > We've actually had false-positives due to how the list is built into > rules. In other words, "i...@ca.com" is still on the list from 2011. > They're also not bounded by default, so noi...@ca.com and > morei...@ca.com would

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-24 Thread Alex
Hi, On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:07:50 + > RW wrote: > >> > OK. Any FPs, though? That's the other half of the test. > >> No, but it's pretty unlikely there would be. > > Actually, it's

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-24 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:07:50 + RW wrote: > > OK. Any FPs, though? That's the other half of the test. > No, but it's pretty unlikely there would be. Actually, it's very likely there will be a lot of FPs, but it's also very likely that any given user of the

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-24 Thread RW
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:22:17 -0500 Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:14:33 + > RW wrote: > > > FWIW I ran that list against 3k spams received from late 2015 > > onwards. I got 2 hits on 2 separate addesses both timestamped with > > 2012. > > OK.

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-22 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 20:14:33 + RW wrote: > FWIW I ran that list against 3k spams received from late 2015 > onwards. I got 2 hits on 2 separate addesses both timestamped with > 2012. OK. Any FPs, though? That's the other half of the test. Regards, Dianne.

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-22 Thread RW
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:23:07 -0500 Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:45:07 + > Vincent Fox wrote: > > > Come on, look at the datestamps on the addresses in that list! > > Plenty from 2009. > > The reason they datestamp the addresses is so that sites making

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-22 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:45:07 + Vincent Fox wrote: > Come on, look at the datestamps on the addresses in that list! > Plenty from 2009. The reason they datestamp the addresses is so that sites making use of the list can determine on their own when data is stale enough to

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-22 Thread Vincent Fox
com> Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:21:14 AM To: SA Mailing list Subject: Google anti-phishing code project Hi all, for some time I've been using the following Google code project for a list of thousands of addresses used in phishing attacks: https://code.google.com/archive/p/anti-phishing

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-20 Thread Andrew
I've not come across these before.. I am too interested in how to integrate them in to SA thanks. On 20 February 2017 at 21:56, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Dianne Skoll > wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:21:08

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-20 Thread Alex
Hi, On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:21:08 -0500 > Alex wrote: > >> Maybe we're using something different. This is the link I was using to >> download the phishing addresses until the other day, when

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-20 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:21:08 -0500 Alex wrote: > Maybe we're using something different. This is the link I was using to > download the phishing addresses until the other day, when it became a > dead link: >

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-20 Thread Alex
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:21:14 -0500 > Alex wrote: > >> https://code.google.com/archive/p/anti-phishing-email-reply/ >> It appears to no longer be active, as some time yesterday. > > It's still

Re: Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-20 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:21:14 -0500 Alex wrote: > https://code.google.com/archive/p/anti-phishing-email-reply/ > It appears to no longer be active, as some time yesterday. It's still active. The most recent commit is dated today, and I still have commit privileges.

Google anti-phishing code project

2017-02-19 Thread Alex
Hi all, for some time I've been using the following Google code project for a list of thousands of addresses used in phishing attacks: https://code.google.com/archive/p/anti-phishing-email-reply/ It appears to no longer be active, as some time yesterday. Anyone have any idea if something has