On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 13:28 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm doing an experimental free MX backup service and wondering if it
will get exploited. I'm wondering if I'm overlooking anything obvious?
Here's the info on it:
http://www.free-mx-backup.com
The idea is that it detects if we are
Steve Freegard wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm doing an experimental free MX backup service and wondering if it
will get exploited. I'm wondering if I'm overlooking anything obvious?
Here's the info on it:
http://www.free-mx-backup.com
The idea is that it detects if we are the secondary
RobertH wrote:
I'm doing an experimental free MX backup service and
wondering if it will get exploited. I'm wondering if I'm
overlooking anything obvious?
Here's the info on it:
http://www.free-mx-backup.com
The idea is that it detects if we are the secondary and not
the primary MX
I'm doing an experimental free MX backup service and wondering if it
will get exploited. I'm wondering if I'm overlooking anything obvious?
Here's the info on it:
http://www.free-mx-backup.com
The idea is that it detects if we are the secondary and not the primary
MX and will store and
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm doing an experimental free MX backup service and wondering if it
will get exploited. I'm wondering if I'm overlooking anything obvious?
Here's the info on it:
http://www.free-mx-backup.com
The idea is that it detects if we are the secondary and not the primary
MX
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Steve Freegard wrote:
5) Privacy concerns; potentially a domains entire mail stream for the
last 5 days could be held on your mail spool. This has obvious privacy
implications for most people particularly as there is no contract
between you and the end-user. How does
I'm doing an experimental free MX backup service and
wondering if it will get exploited. I'm wondering if I'm
overlooking anything obvious?
Here's the info on it:
http://www.free-mx-backup.com
The idea is that it detects if we are the secondary and not
the primary MX and will
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Duane Hill d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Steve Freegard wrote:
5) Privacy concerns; potentially a domains entire mail stream for the
last 5 days could be held on your mail spool. This has obvious privacy
implications for most people
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Duane Hill d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Steve Freegard wrote:
5) Privacy concerns; potentially a domains entire mail stream for the
last 5 days could be held on your mail spool. This has obvious privacy
