On 01/12/15 18:59, RW wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:45:25 +
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
After
setting up a site-wide bayes database as per the wiki instructions
and fixing file permissions etc., and feeding it about 300 spam
messages (I don't get a lot of spam in general) and 12,000 ham
messages
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:45:25 +
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> After
> setting up a site-wide bayes database as per the wiki instructions
> and fixing file permissions etc., and feeding it about 300 spam
> messages (I don't get a lot of spam in general) and 12,000 ham
> messages of my own hand sorted
On 30/11/15 18:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.11.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
spamassassin -D < /path/to/spam-example.eml
Thank you Harald. I did - and it looks like SA does contact lots of
DNSBL's and it receives various messages in reply. Nothing that looks
like failures or error
Am 30.11.2015 um 19:35 schrieb John Hardin:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, David B Funk wrote:
These "snowshoe" spams are a bit difficult to nail because they keep
hopping around. After a day or two they're listed in various RBLS
(both for the IP and URL hostname) but they rarely sit still long
enough
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, David B Funk wrote:
These "snowshoe" spams are a bit difficult to nail because they keep
hopping around. After a day or two they're listed in various RBLS (both
for the IP and URL hostname) but they rarely sit still long enough for
that to help much.
In that vein: is you
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 30/11/15 16:41, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.11.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
OK - this might be a basic question, but recently the detection rate on
my SA install has been really unreliable, so I decided that the first
step is to be sure
Am 30.11.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
spamassassin -D < /path/to/spam-example.eml
Thank you Harald. I did - and it looks like SA does contact lots of
DNSBL's and it receives various messages in reply. Nothing that looks
like failures or errors. I can attach the output here - but it
On 30/11/15 16:41, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.11.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
OK - this might be a basic question, but recently the detection rate on
my SA install has been really unreliable, so I decided that the first
step is to be sure it is using the public dns blocklists and r
Am 30.11.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
OK - this might be a basic question, but recently the detection rate on
my SA install has been really unreliable, so I decided that the first
step is to be sure it is using the public dns blocklists and razor. My
setup:
1. Spamassassin 3.4.1
2. I
OK - this might be a basic question, but recently the detection rate on
my SA install has been really unreliable, so I decided that the first
step is to be sure it is using the public dns blocklists and razor. My
setup:
1. Spamassassin 3.4.1
2. I have Bind configured as recursive, non-forwardi
10 matches
Mail list logo
