--On Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:29 PM -0400 Matt Kettler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see them (yahoo) marketing it as an anti-spam solution. They
market it as a tool to solve problems that anti-spam efforts face
(spoofing).
http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys/
Wouldn't it be better to host
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
Admittedly not much,
My biggest issue was yahoo sporting anti spam options in a spam mail.
I probably shoulda thought a tad more about the post and a tad less
about my beer :-D
It struck me as amusing and a solid example of how the best plans can
bite one in the ass :-D
Apols if any annoyance
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Admittedly not much,
My biggest issue was yahoo sporting anti spam options in a spam mail.
My biggest issue would be the assumption that domainkeys is an anti-spam
option. It's not. Period. No matter what some people at slashdot might
think, it is NOT an anti-spam
Point accepted, but - why do they market it as such?
Nigel
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:45:01 -0400, Matt Kettler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Admittedly not much,
My biggest issue was yahoo sporting anti spam options in a spam mail.
My biggest issue would be the assumption
