Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-11 Thread Marcin Mirosław
W dniu 06.05.2015 o 14:46, Kevin A. McGrail pisze: On 5/5/2015 3:56 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote: W dniu 2015-05-05 o 21:47, Kevin A. McGrail pisze: On 5/5/2015 3:38 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote: I'm thinking about removing all Received headers from email except added by my MTA, storing it,

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-06 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 5/5/2015 3:56 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote: W dniu 2015-05-05 o 21:47, Kevin A. McGrail pisze: On 5/5/2015 3:38 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote: I'm thinking about removing all Received headers from email except added by my MTA, storing it, sending email to spamd and restoring headers. But it looks

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Marcin Mirosław skrev den 2015-05-05 10:51: My goal is to configure SA to not check IP of client (in this example 31.61.129.221). local.cf: trusted_networks 31.61.129.221/32 reload spamd or other glue for spamassassin

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread RW
On Tue, 05 May 2015 10:51:22 +0200 Marcin Miros?aw wrote: Hi! I'm ashamed to ask because this problem is like boomerang but still can't find solution. I'm reading e.g.: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/How-to-ignore-multiple-Received-headers-td52450.html I set trusted_networks but

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Marcin Mirosław
W dniu 2015-05-05 o 20:29, RW pisze: On Tue, 05 May 2015 10:51:22 +0200 Marcin Miros?aw wrote: Hi! I'm ashamed to ask because this problem is like boomerang but still can't find solution. I'm reading e.g.:

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.05.2015 um 21:38 schrieb Marcin Mirosław: W dniu 2015-05-05 o 21:28, Reindl Harald pisze: Am 05.05.2015 um 21:21 schrieb Marcin Mirosław: Thanks for both answers. I'll try to describe it using ascii art: ---- |random user

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 5/5/2015 3:38 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote: I'm thinking about removing all Received headers from email except added by my MTA, storing it, sending email to spamd and restoring headers. But it looks like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut:) What RBL are you concerned about specifically because

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.05.2015 um 21:21 schrieb Marcin Mirosław: Thanks for both answers. I'll try to describe it using ascii art: ---- |random user sending email |sends email |89.161.182.208 from this | |(in my case: 31.61.129.221)

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Marcin Mirosław
W dniu 2015-05-05 o 21:28, Reindl Harald pisze: Am 05.05.2015 um 21:21 schrieb Marcin Mirosław: Thanks for both answers. I'll try to describe it using ascii art: ---- |random user sending email |sends email |89.161.182.208

Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Marcin Mirosław
Hi! I'm ashamed to ask because this problem is like boomerang but still can't find solution. I'm reading e.g.: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/How-to-ignore-multiple-Received-headers-td52450.html I set trusted_networks but I can't see how can it helps (and it doesn't work as I wish).

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Marcin Mirosław skrev den 2015-05-05 21:56: RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS. It looks that lastexternal is what I'm looking for. Is it possible to add '-lastexternal' to all RBL? would be contra productive in local.cf: internal_networks all-mta-ips trusted_networks all-mta-ips # whitelist rbl ips that hits

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Marcin Mirosław
W dniu 2015-05-05 o 21:47, Kevin A. McGrail pisze: On 5/5/2015 3:38 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote: I'm thinking about removing all Received headers from email except added by my MTA, storing it, sending email to spamd and restoring headers. But it looks like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut:)

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Marcin Mirosław
W dniu 2015-05-05 o 22:07, Benny Pedersen pisze: Marcin Mirosław skrev den 2015-05-05 21:21: My goal is to configure SA to not check IP of client (in this example 31.61.129.221). Can you elaborate about what's going on here? What do the two hand-overs represent? What do you mean by real

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
Marcin Mirosław skrev den 2015-05-05 21:21: My goal is to configure SA to not check IP of client (in this example 31.61.129.221). Can you elaborate about what's going on here? What do the two hand-overs represent? What do you mean by real MTA? Thanks for both answers. I'll try to describe

Re: Ignoring Received: header added by real MTA

2015-05-05 Thread RW
On Tue, 05 May 2015 21:21:58 +0200 Marcin Miros?aw wrote: So it's not important for my if address 31.61.129.221 is on any rbl because I'm not getting email directly from this ip. It's important for me if server 89.161.182.208 (which directly connects to my mta) is in any RBL. I'd like SA to