Charles Sprickman wrote:
> I had a look at that page - I use mysql to store the data, have multiple
> spamd boxes, and spamc on the inbound servers passing mail to spamd once all
> the “front door” checks are done. In that config, I end up with unique
> per-user bayes tokens. I’m looking to j
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 02:29 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>> I had a look at that page - I use mysql to store the data, have
>> multiple spamd boxes, and spamc on the inbound servers passing mail to
>> spamd once all the “front door” checks are done. In that config, I
>> end up wi
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:14:22 +
Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> On 02/12/15 12:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 02.12.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
> >> I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a
> >> third question in two days :-)
> >>
> >> I realise the above que
Am 03.12.2015 um 12:41 schrieb Jeroen de Neef:
I'd like to teach my bayes correctly especially since I don't get a lot
of emails, thanks to Reindl's list I will ignore those headers from now on.
But I don't want it to learn that the /*spam*/ in the subject
means that it is spam or ham,
Hello all,
I'd like to teach my bayes correctly especially since I don't get a lot of
emails, thanks to Reindl's list I will ignore those headers from now on.
But I don't want it to learn that the **spam** in the subject means
that it is spam or ham, is there a way I can remove it before t
On 12/03/2015 01:38 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 12/03/2015 02:29 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
I had a look at that page - I use mysql to store the data, have
multiple spamd boxes, and spamc on the inbound servers passing mail
to spamd once all the “front door” checks are done. In that confi
On 12/03/2015 02:29 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
I had a look at that page - I use mysql to store the data, have multiple spamd
boxes, and spamc on the inbound servers passing mail to spamd once all the
“front door” checks are done. In that config, I end up with unique per-user
bayes tokens.
Am 03.12.2015 um 10:47 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
On 03/12/15 01:40, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Alex:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2015-12-02 09:14, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Perfect - that's exactly the sort of real-life based advice I was
l
On 03/12/15 01:40, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Alex:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2015-12-02 09:14, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Perfect - that's exactly the sort of real-life based advice I was
looking
for. Many thanks!
I run a small shared h
On 03/12/15 00:29, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a third
question in two days :-)
I realis
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.12.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> Am 02.12.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a third
question in two days :-)
I realise the above qu
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2015-12-02 09:14, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>>
>> Perfect - that's exactly the sort of real-life based advice I was looking
>> for. Many thanks!
>
> I run a small shared hosting environment, with a global bayes for all users
> as not enough
On 2015-12-02 09:14, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
Perfect - that's exactly the sort of real-life based advice I was
looking for. Many thanks!
I run a small shared hosting environment, with a global bayes for all
users as not enough users are ready/willing/able to take the time to
sort ham (althoug
Am 02.12.2015 um 21:50 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a third
question in two days :-)
I realise the above question is a "soft" question, probably without a
defin
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.12.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
>> I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a third
>> question in two days :-)
>>
>> I realise the above question is a "soft" question, probably without a
>> definite "yes" or "no" answer. I am hopi
On 02/12/15 12:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a third
question in two days :-)
I realise the above question is a "soft" question, probably without a
definite "yes" or "no" answer. I am hopin
Am 02.12.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a third
question in two days :-)
I realise the above question is a "soft" question, probably without a
definite "yes" or "no" answer. I am hoping that people with experience
of using SA
I hope I'm not exceeding the patience of the list by posting a third
question in two days :-)
I realise the above question is a "soft" question, probably without a
definite "yes" or "no" answer. I am hoping that people with experience
of using SA in various environments might be able to throw
18 matches
Mail list logo
