Olivier Nicole wrote:
But here is the question, with milter call, how to manage things like
per user whitelist? As SA is run only once for all the recipients, it
should go on a common set of rules.
To get a milter to process settings per-user on a message with multiple
recipients, you'll have
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
> > > I have a question. Is there any advantage to using say,
> > > Spamass-Milter over calling spamc from procmail?
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:50:13 -0700 (PPT)
> "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Using a milter allows you to reject the message
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > But here is the question, with milter call, how to manage things like
> > per user whitelist? As SA is run only once for all the recipients, it
> > should go on a common set of rules.
On 27.09.07 00:23, David B Funk wrote:
> In the general case, wit
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> But here is the question, with milter call, how to manage things like
> per user whitelist? As SA is run only once for all the recipients, it
> should go on a common set of rules.
In the general case, with a milter (or most in-line filtering)
per-user
> Okay. Can a milter be used with MySQL? The docs seem to indicate
> not.
That is not milter that use MySQl, but SA. Milter is just one way to
activate SA. SA can use MySQL, whether it is called from Procmail or
from Milter.
(I beleive Milter-SA is just calling spamd actually).
Olivier
And amavisd user mysql for wblisting and policy banks .
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Office: 561-999-5000 x 1259
Direct: 561-939-7259
Real time security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news
_
This email has been scanned and certi
Plug for amavisd:
Google for amavisd-new.
It can handle per user wblists, policies, quarantining, etc.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Office: 561-999-5000 x 1259
Direct: 561-939-7259
Real time security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news
___
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:00:51 +0700 (ICT)
Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a question. Is there any advantage to using say,
> > Spamass-Milter over calling spamc from procmail?
>
> I have a bit of answer and one further question.
>
> If the message is sent to a local list of
> I have a question. Is there any advantage to using say,
> Spamass-Milter over calling spamc from procmail?
I have a bit of answer and one further question.
If the message is sent to a local list of recipients (a list managed
on your email server), procmail call will launch SA for each and ever
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:50:13 -0700 (PPT)
"John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
>
> > I have a question. Is there any advantage to using say,
> > Spamass-Milter over calling spamc from procmail?
>
> Using a milter allows you to reject the message during
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
> I have a question. Is there any advantage to using say,
> Spamass-Milter over calling spamc from procmail?
Using a milter allows you to reject the message during the SMTP
conversation. The value of that is, it's far better than generating a
bounce message if
I have a question. Is there any advantage to using say,
Spamass-Milter over calling spamc from procmail?
--
Raquel
This above all: to thine own self be true; And it must follow, as
the night the day; Thou canst not then be false to any
12 matches
Mail list logo
