J.D. Falk wrote:
Jason Bertoch wrote:
I've been hit with that response on a number of occasions. However,
I've found that if I reply, pointing out their obvious error, I get a
positive response. Probably wasted effort, though.
Customer service drones get measured on how quickly they can ma
Jason Bertoch wrote:
I've been hit with that response on a number of occasions. However,
I've found that if I reply, pointing out their obvious error, I get a
positive response. Probably wasted effort, though.
Customer service drones get measured on how quickly they can make the
questioner
Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
And I report this to Yahoo!. They then answer:
We understand your frustration in receiving unsolicited email. While we
investigate all reported violations against the Yahoo! Terms of Service
(TOS), in this particular case the message you received was n
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
>> Return-Path:
>> Received: from web.biz.mail.sk1.yahoo.com
On 11.11.09 17:15, Charles Gregory wrote:
> The 'not from our server' response makes me think that Yahell needs
> to update their e-mail response robot.
>
> A while ago Yahell
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 02:54 +, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:45:00 +0100
> Mark Martinec wrote:
>
>
> > The IP address is not registered as belonging to Yahoo.
> > The message is also missing their DKIM and DK signatures.
>
> OTOH it does have full-circle dns that ends in yahoo.com.
>
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:54:10 +
RW wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:45:00 +0100
> Mark Martinec wrote:
>
>
> > The IP address is not registered as belonging to Yahoo.
> > The message is also missing their DKIM and DK signatures.
>
> OTOH it does have full-circle dns that ends in yahoo.com.
On 11-Nov-2009, at 17:45, Mark Martinec wrote:
> The IP address is not registered as belonging to Yahoo.
> The message is also missing their DKIM and DK signatures.
Yes it is.
Wikipedia:
"After the bursting of the dot-com bubble, Inktomi was acquired byYahoo!"
--
i wasn't born a programmer. i
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:45:00 +0100
Mark Martinec wrote:
> The IP address is not registered as belonging to Yahoo.
> The message is also missing their DKIM and DK signatures.
OTOH it does have full-circle dns that ends in yahoo.com.
On 11-Nov-2009, at 14:33, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> And I report this to Yahoo!
Yahoo is more and more like hotmail. I simply bin everything, mark them up,
and recommend that people stop using them. They are extremely difficult to work
with, seem to be staffed by total morons (as in your
On Wednesday November 11 2009 22:33:12 Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
> This isn't so much of a technical question as a policy one.
>
> I get a lot of spam which looks like:
>
> Return-Path:
> Received: from web.biz.mail.sk1.yahoo.com
> (web.biz.mail.sk1.yahoo.com [74.6.114.43])
$ whois
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
Return-Path:
Received: from web.biz.mail.sk1.yahoo.com
The 'not from our server' response makes me think that Yahell needs
to update their e-mail response robot.
A while ago Yahell started partnering with companies like Rogers telecom
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
This isn't so much of a technical question as a policy one.
I get a lot of spam which looks like:
Return-Path:
Received: from web.biz.mail.sk1.yahoo.com (web.biz.mail.sk1.yahoo.com
[74.6.114.43])
by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.14
This isn't so much of a technical question as a policy one.
I get a lot of spam which looks like:
Return-Path:
Received: from web.biz.mail.sk1.yahoo.com (web.biz.mail.sk1.yahoo.com
[74.6.114.43])
by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id nA8KXHbF007914
for ; Sun
13 matches
Mail list logo
