Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

Marc Perkel wrote: John Rudd wrote: Loren Wilton wrote: the last byte of the return is a number from 1-255. This is the hosts 1 means "not only have we never seen ham come from this host, it has all kinds of danger signals that indicate you shouldn't ever trust them to do anything useful

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

John Rudd wrote: Loren Wilton wrote: the last byte of the return is a number from 1-255. This is the hosts 1 means "not only have we never seen ham come from this host, it has all kinds of danger signals that indicate you shouldn't ever trust them to do anything useful". You probably re

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

Marc Perkel wrote: > > > Bret Miller wrote: >> >> >> . >> >> OK... but the rules you supplied for SpamAssassin did exactly that-- >> they looked back at all the received headers and X-Original-IP and >> tested them against the lists. Add a -lastexternal to the set name to >> get only the la

RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bret Miller wrote: From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bret Miller wrote: Bret Miller wrote: * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam *

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

Loren Wilton wrote: the last byte of the return is a number from 1-255. This is the hosts 1 means "not only have we never seen ham come from this host, it has all kinds of danger signals that indicate you shouldn't ever trust them to do anything useful". You probably really need one bit so

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

Bret Miller wrote: *From:* Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bret Miller wrote: Bret Miller wrote: * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam * 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam and nonspam

RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bret Miller wrote: Bret Miller wrote: * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam * 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam and nonspam

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

Bret Miller wrote: Bret Miller wrote: * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam * 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam and nonspam * 127.0.0.4 - brownlist - all spam - but not yet enough to blacklist

RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

Bret Miller wrote: * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam * 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam and nonspam * 127.0.0.4 - brownlist - all spam - but not yet e

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

Bret Miller wrote: * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam * 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam and nonspam * 127.0.0.4 - brownlist - all spam - but not yet enough to blacklist And hotmail.com warrants being blac

RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

> * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam > * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam > * 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam > and nonspam > * 127.0.0.4 - brownlist - all spam - but > not yet enough >

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

the last byte of the return is a number from 1-255. This is the hosts 1 means "not only have we never seen ham come from this host, it has all kinds of danger signals that indicate you shouldn't ever trust them to do anything useful". You probably really need one bit somewhere that says "th

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

Bret Miller wrote: Before you look at this as just another blacklist - the real power is in the white and yellow lists. First - an overview. My list returns these codes: * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam * 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

Bret Miller wrote: Before you look at this as just another blacklist - the real power is in the white and yellow lists. First - an overview. My list returns these codes: * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam * 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix of spam an

RE: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

> Before you look at this as just another blacklist - the real > power is in the white and yellow lists. First - an overview. > My list returns these codes: > > > > * 127.0.0.1 - whilelist - trusted nonspam > * 127.0.0.2 - blacklist - block spam > * 127.0.0.3 - yellowlist - mix

Re: Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

header __RCVD_IN_JMFILTER eval:check_rbl('JMFILTER','hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com.') describe __RCVD_IN_JMFILTER Sender listed in JMFILTER tflags __RCVD_IN_JMFILTER net header RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_W eval:check_rbl_sub('JMFILTER', '127.0.0.1') describe RCVD_IN_JMFILTER_W Sender listed in JMFILTER-WH

Need a plugin written relating to black/white/yellow lists

I'd like to get some people to take an idea that I'm been using successfully for a long time that I would like to see implemented in SA. I'm doing it mostly with Exim rules and generating these lists in some unusual ways. But if this were done right it would make SA a lot faster and more accura