[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello list,
For your consideration:
header __MULTIPART_RELATED Content-Type =~ /multipart\/related/
meta OE_MULTIPART_RELATED (__OE_MUA __MULTIPART_RELATED)
describe OE_MULTIPART_RELATED Possible image spam forged as from MS Outlook
The false
On Monday 04 December 2006 01:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this would trap mail using outlook stationery.
I dont really like it, but I get it in wanted mail.
Yup. All of the FPs in my corpus are outlook messages with inline images. But
it turns out that some of those are also spam; the actual
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Ian Turner wrote:
When used in combination with, say, DC_GIF_UNO_LARGO,
RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, and RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, this rule can help
make a more solid prediction.
The perceptron doesn't create meta rules, does it?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Monday 04 December 2006 16:19, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Ian Turner wrote:
When used in combination with, say, DC_GIF_UNO_LARGO,
RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, and RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, this rule can help
make a more solid prediction.
The perceptron doesn't create meta rules,
Hello list,
For your consideration:
header __MULTIPART_RELATED Content-Type =~ /multipart\/related/
meta OE_MULTIPART_RELATED (__OE_MUA __MULTIPART_RELATED)
describe OE_MULTIPART_RELATED Possible image spam forged as from MS Outlook
The false Positive rate on my corpus is 0.1%. I can't tell
Hello list,
For your consideration:
header __MULTIPART_RELATED Content-Type =~ /multipart\/related/
meta OE_MULTIPART_RELATED (__OE_MUA __MULTIPART_RELATED)
describe OE_MULTIPART_RELATED Possible image spam forged as from MS Outlook
The false Positive rate on my corpus is 0.1%. I
