On 4/9/2021 8:26 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
That sounds reasonable. But my experience is that spamhaus RBLs (zen,
zrd, dbl) have a zero false positive rate (or so low that I have never
found one). IMHO if an email is matched by spamhaus it is the sender's
big problem, not the recipient's. (An
On 2021-04-10 15:59, RW wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:44:54 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
dont use public dns servers ever, free or not
It's not about using public caches. They are going to block look-ups
from generic rDNS as well. I think they are already blocking some VPS
address blocks.
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:44:54 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> dont use public dns servers ever, free or not
>
It's not about using public caches. They are going to block look-ups
from generic rDNS as well. I think they are already blocking some VPS
address blocks.
On 2021-04-10 15:28, RW wrote:
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 08:56:19 -0400
Rob McEwen wrote:
On 4/10/2021 6:55 AM, Jared Hall wrote:
> Rob, I gotta say that I am impressed with the whole Spamhaus-dqs
> program and their use of customer keyed DNS zone queries. Seems to
> be the way around the client DNS
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 08:56:19 -0400
Rob McEwen wrote:
> On 4/10/2021 6:55 AM, Jared Hall wrote:
> > Rob, I gotta say that I am impressed with the whole Spamhaus-dqs
> > program and their use of customer keyed DNS zone queries. Seems to
> > be the way around the client DNS forwarder issues. How a
On 4/10/2021 6:55 AM, Jared Hall wrote:
Rob, I gotta say that I am impressed with the whole Spamhaus-dqs
program and their use of customer keyed DNS zone queries. Seems to be
the way around the client DNS forwarder issues. How are you guys at
Invaluement tracking in that area?
I'm not sure
(you might be disappointed with SORBS in those areas too? - that's fine
- I'm just trying to clarify that overly judging a DNSBL based on
/*particular*/ false negatives can be overly harsh and might miss the
good things that a DNSBL has to offer)
Probably not that. It is just SORBS. Like whe
On 09/04/2021 15:57, Rob McEwen wrote:
On 4/9/2021 10:34 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
above ip is not
listed yet, with inho is sign of no maintain at all anymore
So I noticed that this IP you mentioned is a heavily-listed IP
On 4/9/2021 10:34 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
above ip is not listed yet, with inho is sign of no maintain at all
anymore
So I noticed that this IP you mentioned is a heavily-listed IP that is
currently listed on many DNSBLs, including many of the best and most
reliable and accurate ones. (I t
http://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/5.188.206.246.html
currently i am not using sorbs anymore in spamassassin, to much outdated
listnings, and clear the above ip is not listed yet, with inho is sign
of no maintain at all anymore
and lastly i like to know how to contact sorbs.net owners, my own
10 matches
Mail list logo
