Hi!
Personally I wouldn't use OpenDNS on a server (except maybe for
squid). It's not a normal DNS server, it does things that are aimed at
browsers like spelling correction, and redirecting failures to it's own
web servers. The latter presumably breaks the NO_DNS_FOR_FROM test,
and I wouldn't
On 4/2/2009 10:34 PM, Mike Bostock wrote:
If anyone can point me in the direction of some
assistance I would be very grateful.
http://forums.opendns.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=3423page=1
http://www.opendns.com/support/article/33
RW a écrit :
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:12:17 +0200 (CEST)
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Fri, April 3, 2009 00:31, Mike Bostock wrote:
Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being not a proper DNS and, as I
have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it
and go back to using my
Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders for my
server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs.
named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving
'btinternet.com.multi.uribl.com/A/IN': 208.67.220.220#53
I am assuming it is SpamAssassin causing this but I could
On 4/2/2009 10:34 PM, Mike Bostock wrote:
Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders for my
server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs.
named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving
'btinternet.com.multi.uribl.com/A/IN': 208.67.220.220#53
I am assuming
http://forums.opendns.com/comments.php?DiscussionID=3423page=1
Uribl should probaly get an rsync of the zones, if they are doing 50mm
queries a day, imagine what will hit urlbl servers directly, since opendns
caches the queries.
(I think a opendns does this with some of the more
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:34:26 +0100
Mike Bostock spamt...@yew-tree.co.uk wrote:
Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders
for my server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs.
named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) resolving
At 02:52 PM 4/2/2009, you wrote:
Personally I wouldn't use OpenDNS on a server (except maybe for
squid). It's not a normal DNS server, it does things that are aimed at
browsers like spelling correction, and redirecting failures to it's own
web servers. The latter presumably breaks the
Michael Scheidell wrote:
Uribl should probaly get an rsync of the zones, if they are doing 50mm
queries a day, imagine what will hit urlbl servers directly, since opendns
caches the queries.
(I think a opendns does this with some of the more popular zones anyway)
This would be good for
In your message regarding Re: OpenDNS and Spamassassin dated 02/04/2009,
Evan Platt said ...
EP- At 02:52 PM 4/2/2009, you wrote:
Personally I wouldn't use OpenDNS on a server (except maybe for
squid). It's not a normal DNS server, it does things that are aimed at
browsers like spelling
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Mike Bostock wrote:
Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being not a proper DNS and, as I have
squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it and go back to
using my ISP's DNS servers as forwarders.
You still need to keep an eye on it. Several (larger) ISPs have
On Fri, April 3, 2009 00:31, Mike Bostock wrote:
Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being not a proper DNS and, as I
have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it
and go back to using my ISP's DNS servers as forwarders.
bind works better without forwarders, it common error to
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:12:17 +0200 (CEST)
Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On Fri, April 3, 2009 00:31, Mike Bostock wrote:
Noted the stuff about OpenDNS being not a proper DNS and, as I
have squid set up but not in use, I may just point squid at it
and go back to using my ISP's DNS
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:52, RW wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:34:26 +0100
Mike Bostock spamt...@yew-tree.co.uk wrote:
Since starting to use OpenDNS and using their servers as forwarders
for my server at home I am seeing loads of this below in the logs.
named[]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL)
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:56, Evan Platt wrote:
I logged into our server, and saw the OpenDNS was resolving
EVERYTHING - blah.blah , nothing.nothing, etc.
This is not a OpenDNS problem, this is a problem with the know-nothing
who set it up for their system. I used OpenDNS for quite a while on
On Fri, April 3, 2009 02:24, LuKreme wrote:
Or am I wrong? I could be wrong.
Bittorrent is slow to :)
firefox with proxy to squid on a host with multi-isp uplinks is bad
also, since it just use one isp lines that are slow
dns is udp, and works very fast if one let it, what uribl can do is
to
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:32 PM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:56, Evan Platt wrote:
I logged into our server, and saw the OpenDNS was resolving EVERYTHING -
blah.blah , nothing.nothing, etc.
This is not a OpenDNS problem, this is a problem with the know-nothing who
At 05:32 PM 4/2/2009, you wrote:
On 2-Apr-2009, at 15:56, Evan Platt wrote:
I logged into our server, and saw the OpenDNS was resolving
EVERYTHING - blah.blah , nothing.nothing, etc.
This is not a OpenDNS problem, this is a problem with the know-nothing
who set it up for their system. I used
18 matches
Mail list logo
