I'm looking to add other DNSBL's to tomorrow's weekly mass check. I
realize most of them probably are too broken to bother, but it would be
nice to get some real numbers to confirm it so since the Internet lacks
any real DNSBL comparisons that include Ham FP safety.
http://ant
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 09:41:57AM -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> I'm looking to add other DNSBL's to tomorrow's weekly mass check. I
> realize most of them probably are too broken to bother, but it would be
> nice to get some real numbers to confirm it so since the Int
>
> Any other DNSBL's out there that you folks use that are worth
> comparing?
>
> Warren Togami
> wtog...@redhat.com
Warren,
ask michael scheidell... he has a list for you that is 100% effective...
:-)
- rh
> ask michael scheidell... he has a list for you that is 100% effective...
yeah, like that same joke that grandpa keeps telling over and over.. the
first time it was a little bit funny... but now it is annoying,
particularly the way he is the only one in the room laughing each time.
--
Rob McEwe
R-Elists wrote:
Warren,
ask michael scheidell... he has a list for you that is 100% effective...
seriously, google for 'blocked.secnap.net'
give it a try, any ip address that you ever even got one spam on is listed.
(note, if you use this list on a production system it will block legit
em
Warren Togami wrote:
I'm looking to add other DNSBL's to tomorrow's weekly mass check. I
realize most of them probably are too broken to bother, but it would be
nice to get some real numbers to confirm it so since the Internet lacks
any real DNSBL comparisons that includ
Henrik K schrieb:
> IMO a centralized rsync datasource for all the mass checked BLs would be
> nice. Wonder if someone had the connections to pull it off? It would save
> resources from all and speed up the checks. Spamhaus etc would only need to
> "donate" the data once a week.
We don't see any
Replying to a private post in public because the results are important.
On 10/16/2009 10:22 AM, Anonymous wrote:
http://www.lashback.com/support/UnsubscribeBlacklistSupport.aspx
It seems to hit a lot, but I don't have a good feel for how reliable it
is.
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091017
> I'm looking to add other DNSBL's to tomorrow's weekly mass check. I
> realize most of them probably are too broken to bother, but it would be
> nice to get some real numbers to confirm it so since the Internet lacks
> any real DNSBL comparisons that include Ham FP
BL's servers
--j.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 14:41, Warren Togami wrote:
> I'm looking to add other DNSBL's to tomorrow's weekly mass check. I realize
> most of them probably are too broken to bother, but it would be nice to get
> some real numbers to confirm it so
10 matches
Mail list logo
