Re: Parsing Received Headers

2007-09-21 Thread Thomas Kishel
municated from 123.456.789.200 # but reverse of 123.456.789.200 is name-z.source.com -- Tom Kishel Dark Horse Comics -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Parsing-Received-Headers-tf4361839.html#a12827592 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Parsing Received Headers

2007-09-04 Thread Bret Miller
> > I'm trying to get received headers to parse correctly > because the ones from > > CommuniGate Pro don't always. And, since I'm already > modifying the headers > > in my connector due to the MTA not being able to do RDNS > without rejecting > > based on it, I'm not aware that certain types of

Re: Parsing Received Headers

2007-09-03 Thread Mark Martinec
Bret, > I'm trying to get received headers to parse correctly because the ones from > CommuniGate Pro don't always. And, since I'm already modifying the headers > in my connector due to the MTA not being able to do RDNS without rejecting > based on it, I'm not aware that certain types of headers d

Re: Parsing Received Headers

2007-09-02 Thread John Rudd
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Bret Miller wrote: Received: from [206.74.184.2] (HELO [206.74.184.2]) by mail.wcg.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) ... Meaning that there was no RDNS for 206.74.184.2 and when it said helo, it said "HELO [206.74.184.2]". However, SA is not parsing it that

Re: Parsing Received Headers

2007-09-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Bret Miller wrote: > > Received: from [206.74.184.2] (HELO [206.74.184.2]) > > by mail.wcg.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) > > ... > > Meaning that there was no RDNS for 206.74.184.2 and when it said helo, it > > said "HELO [206.74.184.2]". However, SA is not parsing it that way. So, can >

Re: Parsing Received Headers

2007-09-01 Thread John Rudd
Bret Miller wrote: Received: from [206.74.184.2] (HELO [206.74.184.2]) by mail.wcg.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) ... Meaning that there was no RDNS for 206.74.184.2 Actually, CommuniGate sometimes does that even when RDNS _is_ available. For example: Received: from [128.114.12

Re: Parsing Received Headers

2007-09-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Bret Miller wrote: > Received: from [206.74.184.2] (HELO [206.74.184.2]) >by mail.wcg.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) > ... > Meaning that there was no RDNS for 206.74.184.2 and when it said helo, it > said "HELO [206.74.184.2]". However, SA is not parsing it that way. So, can > anyone te

Parsing Received Headers

2007-08-31 Thread Bret Miller
I'm trying to get received headers to parse correctly because the ones from CommuniGate Pro don't always. And, since I'm already modifying the headers in my connector due to the MTA not being able to do RDNS without rejecting based on it, I'm not aware that certain types of headers don't parse corr