> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 5:14 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RBL Misfires?
>
>
> It would be useful if you could forward the messages that falsely
> trigg
; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
> ;; QUERY SECTION:
> ;; vantagemobility.com.ws.surbl.org, type = A, class = IN
[...]
(and similar lookups on numeric RBLs like
dig 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org)
There have been other sporadic reports of RBL misfires, which
leads me to w
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:57 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RBL Misfires?
> Most likely scenario:
>
> 1. Someone erroneously reports the domain name to SURBL.
>
Nate Schindler wrote:
Once in a while, I notice a hit for an RBL-related test that seems a
little off. When I check for the existance of a record in the list, I
can't find one. Below is a match SA 3 found in an e-mail from one of
our dealers. I thought it was curious that they were listed, so
At 01:28 PM 10/12/2004, Nate Schindler wrote:
Once in a while, I notice a hit for an RBL-related test that seems a
little off. When I check for the existance of a record in the list, I
can't find one. Below is a match SA 3 found in an e-mail from one of our
dealers. I thought it was curious t
Title: RBL Misfires?
Once in a while, I notice a hit for an RBL-related test that seems a little off. When I check for the existance of a record in the list, I can't find one. Below is a match SA 3 found in an e-mail from one of our dealers. I thought it was curious that they were l
