Re: RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID false-positives?

2007-05-30 Thread Per Jessen
mouss wrote: Per Jessen wrote: Is anyone using the CompleteWhois info? I have reduced the score to 0.5 (did that a long time ago, so I don't have the corresponding FPs at hands). OK, thanks - I was just wondering how much I should really trust/value the CompleteWhois info. /Per

Re: RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID false-positives?

2007-05-20 Thread mouss
Per Jessen wrote: Recently I seem to be getting more than the usual batch of FPs, which I've tracked to be due to RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID giving 2.2 points. According to the explanation, it reports an IP on an invalid block - RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID RBL: CompleteWhois: sender on invalid IP

RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID false-positives?

2007-05-16 Thread Per Jessen
Recently I seem to be getting more than the usual batch of FPs, which I've tracked to be due to RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID giving 2.2 points. According to the explanation, it reports an IP on an invalid block - RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID RBL: CompleteWhois: sender on invalid IP * block