>
> Now THAT is off-topic. We are discussing the use of SA at SMTP time.
> Please stay on-topic for this group, and for this thread.
>
> If you actually care to continue, I expect a reasonable
> response to my arguments about rejection being better than
> bouncing or silent diversion.
> Geez
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
and you find it doesn't make sense to spam-scan messages and
reject them in/after DATA stage in a real world scenario.
You ignore my arguments. Hardly surprising.
You reword yours, but say nothing new.
It makes only sense if you are die-hard spam-fig
