> > Now THAT is off-topic. We are discussing the use of SA at SMTP time. > Please stay on-topic for this group, and for this thread. > > If you actually care to continue, I expect a reasonable > response to my arguments about rejection being better than > bouncing or silent diversion. > Geez, you didn't even try to advocate a system of notices to > the user to overcome the 'silent' portion of that argument. > Do I have to argue both sides for you? :) > > - C >
Charles, with all due respect and in right spirit.... you know way too much for anyone to have an argument with you... if you cannot implement all processing and reject in DATA phase, then well... there it is... work on it... your next post says you sometimes have to reject after... and i quote you --- Charles Gregory Quote:Re: [sa] Re: SMTP REJECT after DATA "The only efficiency to be gained is to reject as much as possible after the RCPT_TO, before accepting DATA. But for systems like mine, with lousy user cooperation, rejecting some of the mail after DATA is still the best option." --- i would say you are arguing "both sides" and that it might be the issue. i would tend to believe that most have made the choice not to straddle the fence are you blaming the users for your administration? ;-) - rh
