> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 8:20 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r different results
>
> Second, You mis-u
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Further, spamassassin -r and sa-learn --spam learn differently, give
>>> different results:
>>>
>>>
>> By any chance was the message used scanned by SA already?
>>
>> I'm wondering if it's a bug where spamassassin -r is stripping mar
> I'm wondering if it's a bug where spamassassin -r is
> stripping markups, but sa-learn is not.
Spamassassin has a -d (remove-markup) option, but sa-learn does not.
I am not using the -d option, furthermore, sa-learn 'learns' more
tokens.
A lot more.
I would suspect that sa with -d would lear
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 8:49 AM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r different results
>
> I'm
Matt Kettler wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
# sa-learn -L --spam and spamassassin -L -r learn the same spam
differently.
SA version 3.13, using db or sql database, doesn't seem to matter,
--sync or not --sync, doesn't matter.
Also, it doesn't matter if I run sa-learn --spam or sp
Matt Kettler writes:
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > # sa-learn -L --spam and spamassassin -L -r learn the same spam
> > differently.
> > SA version 3.13, using db or sql database, doesn't seem to matter,
> > --sync or not --sync, doesn't matter.
> >
> > Also, it doesn't matter if I run sa-learn --
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> # sa-learn -L --spam and spamassassin -L -r learn the same spam
> differently.
> SA version 3.13, using db or sql database, doesn't seem to matter,
> --sync or not --sync, doesn't matter.
>
> Also, it doesn't matter if I run sa-learn --spam or spamassassin -r
> first.
>
>