Matt Kettler wrote:
no, see my test methodologyMichael Scheidell wrote:# sa-learn -L --spam and spamassassin -L -r learn the same spam differently. SA version 3.13, using db or sql database, doesn't seem to matter, --sync or not --sync, doesn't matter.Also, it doesn't matter if I run sa-learn --spam or spamassassin -r first. Further, spamassassin -r and sa-learn --spam learn differently, give different results:By any chance was the message used scanned by SA already? I'm wondering if it's a bug where spamassassin -r is stripping markups, but sa-learn is not. I erased the file and created a blank one. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO SECNAP Network Security / www.secnap.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 1+561-999-5000, x 1131 |
- BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r different result... Michael Scheidell
- Re: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r differe... Matt Kettler
- Re: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r diff... Justin Mason
- Re: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r dif... Michael Scheidell
- Re: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r... Matt Kettler
- RE: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r differe... Michael Scheidell
- RE: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r differe... Michael Scheidell