Re: Bayes Questions

2005-07-14 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Herb Martin wrote on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:35:55 -0500: > I checked magic, performed learn with each of ham/spam, > saw positive sign that 'M of N messages were learned' and > yet on viewing magic subsequently the numbers for both > nspam and nham had not changed. You probably learned with a dif

Re: Bayes Questions

2005-07-12 Thread Matt Kettler
Andrew Ott wrote: > For those of you running large sites ( we have about 12,000 users, with > 210,000 messages a day) what do you have for a bayes_expiry_max_db_size? Sorry, I'm not a large site, can't answer that. > Also is there any way to see the count of spam and ham messages that are in > t

RE: Bayes Questions

2005-07-12 Thread Herb Martin
> From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Andrew Ott wrote on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:37:42 -0600: > > > Also is there any way to see the count of spam and ham > messages that > > are in the bayes database, I can't seem to find any info on > that. I > > want to make sure there are a lot

Re: Bayes Questions

2005-07-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Andrew Ott wrote on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:37:42 -0600: > Also is there any way to see the count of spam and ham messages that are in > the bayes database, I can't seem to find any info on that. I want to make > sure there are a lot in there before I turn the bayes rules on. sa-learn --dump magic

Re: Bayes Questions

2005-07-11 Thread Daniel J. Cody
Andrew, Andrew Ott wrote: Also is there any way to see the count of spam and ham messages that are in the bayes database, I can't seem to find any info on that. I want to make sure there are a lot in there before I turn the bayes rules on. If you run spamassassin --lint -D you should see a li

Re: Bayes questions

2005-01-27 Thread jdow
I have found that this is quite worth while. {^_^} - Original Message - From: "Johan Segernäs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: 2005 January, 27, Thursday 02:29 Subject: Bayes questions > If I have confirmed spam with BAYES_50 but not high enough for spamassassin > to autolearn as spam, sh

Re: Bayes questions

2005-01-27 Thread Johann Spies
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 11:29:31AM +0100, Johan Segernäs wrote: > If I have confirmed spam with BAYES_50 but not high enough for spamassassin > to autolearn as spam, should I add this to a spam-bucket and force into > bayes-db or is it waste of time? As I understand it the BAYES_SCORE plays no par