> but I don't send "messages to you from the users mailing list seem to
> have been bouncing".
> What do I have to do to resolve the problem?
>
> Andrea
Andrea
If you are using SA on your mail server, make sure that you whitelist all
the lists that you are subscribed to... sometimes they will b
but I don't send "messages to you from the users mailing list seem to
have been bouncing".
What do I have to do to resolve the problem?
You misunderstand. You are signed up to receive messages from this mailing
list. The mailing list demon has attempted to send messages FROM the list
TO you.
Matthew Newton wrote:
What would be the benefits of creating rules that fired on bounce
messages only (i.e. came from <>), and hit stuff like this. Are there
any reasons why giving a score of 10 when matching "Spam-Score: "
on a bounce would cause a real bounce to get rejected?
Yes, if the
Look at Time Jackson's Bogus Virus Warning ruleset. It is designed to catch
backscatter of this general sort. Might not handle your exact case, but
worth a try.
Loren
At 06:03 PM 2/10/2005, Jason Bennett wrote:
I agree whole heartedly, so I've set all the amavisd rules to D_REJECT,
but I still get the "Undeliverable:Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender"
bounces. How do I turn these off?
If you're post-queue, you can't use D_REJECT.. It's too late. You've got to
ROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:52 PM
To: Jason Bennett; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bounces
At 05:33 PM 2/10/2005, Jason Bennett wrote:
>2. How can I reduce or even dump the bounces all together so my queue's
>aren't filling up with junk bounces with invali
At 05:33 PM 2/10/2005, Jason Bennett wrote:
2. How can I reduce or even dump the bounces all together so my queue's
aren't filling up with junk bounces with invalid destinations?
Just don't use bouncing as a spam action at all if you filter after queue..
this is just a bad thing to do in general.
