On Friday 25 August 2006 11:20, Kenneth Porter wrote:
We need to stop giving a free pass to broken content creation software just
because it's popular. When someone sends you broken content, you should
react the same way you would if they sent you documents on dirt-smeared
paper. Stop letting
I think we should discourage all broken content in email and on the
web.
But who is to decide what is broken. Just because
giftext/giffix/gocr/etc. fail to parse it, doesn't necessarily mean it's
broken. The software may be buggy (note the patches on the download
page needed to make these
On Friday 25 August 2006 11:33, Kash, Howard (Civ, ARL/CISD) wrote:
I think we should discourage all broken content in email and on the
web.
But who is to decide what is broken. Just because
giftext/giffix/gocr/etc. fail to parse it, doesn't necessarily mean it's
broken.
Yes, by
Yes, by definition, it DOES mean its broken.
So when then giftext author made an error in assuming every image would
have a global colormap, he redefined the GIF specification so that any
that don't are no longer valid?
Howard
On Friday 25 August 2006 11:40, Kash, Howard (Civ, ARL/CISD) wrote:
Yes, by definition, it DOES mean its broken.
So when then giftext author made an error in assuming every image would
have a global colormap, he redefined the GIF specification so that any
that don't are no longer valid?
One
