On 2017-02-17 (14:51 MST), David Jones wrote:
>
>> From: @lbutlr
> .Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 3:41 PM
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>
>> On 2017-02-16 (07:21 MST), David Jones wrote:
>>>
Hi,
>> I am using Postfix and cluebringer does looks pretty slick
>> so I will check into that.
Is that policyD?
http://wiki.policyd.org/start
It looks helpful, but hasn't had any development in at least two years.
Thanks,
Alex
On Friday 17 Feb 2017 at 21:51, David Jones wrote:
> Not all compromised accounts these days blast out at a high rate like we
> used to see years ago.
True, but also, some still do.
> I have had a few sneaky ones recently trickle spam through to stay below
> the radar so rate-limiting is not the
>From: @lbutlr
.Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 3:41 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>On 2017-02-16 (07:21 MST), David Jones wrote:
>>
>>> From: Christian Grunfeld
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 20
On 2017-02-16 (07:21 MST), David Jones wrote:
>
>> From: Christian Grunfeld
>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 7:50 AM
>> To: Spamassassin List
>> Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>
>> Are you using postfix as MTA? I use cluebringer suite which
>&
Am 16.02.2017 um 11:07 schrieb David Jones:
> My mail filters also do a lot of outbound relaying from hundreds
> of customer mail servers. Compromised accounts happen and I
> have some methods for detecting most of them and block the
> sender at the MTA within a few minutes to prevent my server
>
>From: Reindl Harald
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:55 AM
>To: David Jones; Spamassassin List
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
Am 16.02.2017 um 15:49 schrieb David Jones:
>> From: Christian Grunfeld
>> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:29 AM
>> To
>From: Dianne Skoll
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:30 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:07:46 +
>David Jones wrote:
>> Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
>> rul
2017-02-16 11:49 GMT-03:00 David Jones :
>
>
> Many of the SMTP sending software that my customers
> use are not full MTAs with queuing capabilities so some email
> would be lost if I rate limited. I also have stupid mail sending
> devices like scanners/copiers that could get lumped in with
> oth
>From: Christian Grunfeld
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 8:29 AM
>To: Spamassassin List
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>Why not rate limiting? I think everyone is doing itI do...
> Cluebringer quotas can track one to one, one to many and
>many to one (botnet
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:07:46 +
David Jones wrote:
> Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
> rules for checking the To: header or could the FreeMail plugin
> be extended to add new rules like FREEMAIL_TO?
The To: header may not contain useful information. I don't think
the
ary 16, 2017 7:50 AM
> >To: Spamassassin List
> >Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>
> >Are you using postfix as MTA? I use cluebringer suite which
> >has a lot of functionality (spf checks, helo checks, greylist
> >and quotas)
>
> I am using Postfix and cl
>From: Christian Grunfeld
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 7:50 AM
>To: Spamassassin List
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>Are you using postfix as MTA? I use cluebringer suite which
>has a lot of functionality (spf checks, helo checks, greylist
>and quotas)
I
gt; >Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:54 AM
> >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>
> >On 02/16/2017 11:07 AM, David Jones wrote:
> >> Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
> >> rules for checking
>From: Axb
>Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 4:54 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Filtering outbound mail
>On 02/16/2017 11:07 AM, David Jones wrote:
>> Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
>> rules for checking the To: h
On 02/16/2017 11:07 AM, David Jones wrote:
Would it make sense for me to setup/manage my own custom
rules for checking the To: header or could the FreeMail plugin
be extended to add new rules like FREEMAIL_TO?
To block outbound bursts using SA is probably the most inneficient method.
Fai2ban i
Tim Densmore wrote on Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:06:52 -0700:
> I take it that outbound filtering isn't something many people do. Does
> anyone have any pointers at all for this sort of thing?
Take a look at MailScanner. It scans in and out and up and beyond.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get
take a look - thanks!
Thank you,
Tim "TD" Densmore
Cyber Mesa Telecom
Santa Fe Headquarters
Tel: 505-988-9200
Local Contact Numbers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 10:17 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apa
Tim Densmore wrote:
> I take it that outbound filtering isn't something many people do.
> Does anyone have any pointers at all for this sort of thing? Should
> I report back to the person who tasked me with this that this idea is
> essentially a non-starter?
Try MIMEDefang instead of spamass-mil
Hi Folks,
I take it that outbound filtering isn't something many people do. Does
anyone have any pointers at all for this sort of thing? Should I report
back to the person who tasked me with this that this idea is essentially a
non-starter?
Thank you,
Tim "TD" Densmore
Cyber Mesa Telecom
Sant
20 matches
Mail list logo
