>
> I hope this helps somebody else from making the same mistake.
>
> Brian
>
I looked all over the Internet about 5 years ago for the best anti-spam
software. I wanted it to be Windows-based easy to use, etc.
Well, I found the best anti-spam software and it turned out to be
SpamAssassin. It wa
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 19:34 -0700, jdow wrote:
> If I was feeling stinky I'd note that I do not like web administration
> tools as much as I like editing the files myself by hand doing things
> I understand from an overdose of RTFM. And I'm not a Linux guy last
> time I checked myself in front of a
But isn't that that beauty of SA. You don't have to be a Linux guy to
install it.
> -Original Message-
> From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 7:35 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: For those who are consid
If I was feeling stinky I'd note that I do not like web administration
tools as much as I like editing the files myself by hand doing things
I understand from an overdose of RTFM. And I'm not a Linux guy last
time I checked myself in front of a mirror.
{^,-} But I'm not. (Besides "ix guy" is pe
12, 2006 8:44 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: For those who are considering a Barracuda Network Device server
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 11:41 -0600, wrote:
> | I pretty much at this time strictly use the Barracuda as a buffer to
> | 'tone' down traffic that would m
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 11:41 -0600, wrote:
> | I pretty much at this time strictly use the Barracuda as a buffer to 'tone'
> down
> | traffic that would make our server drop to its knees. We are in process
> | of getting a firewall in place and when that happens, the Barracuda will
> | prob
RE: For those who are considering a Barracuda Network Device server|Funny
story, I've had phone
conversations with them about being possibly employed. I got weird mixed
signals. Things didn't seem
right. I heard a |few stories. They asked me to come up with a solution of some
sort
Jeff Chan wrote:
>
> Doesn't Barracuda use SpamAssassin in their boxes? If so it's
> not too surprising that it wouldn't perform much differently from
> SpamAssassin :-)
It's probably using an old version *shrug*
>
> Barracuda may not use SARE, so SARE may indeed be better.
Quite pos
Helpdesk x2312 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 12:46 PM
To:
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: For those who are considering a Barracuda Network Device
server
On Monday, June 12, 2006, 10:23:20 AM
On Monday, June 12, 2006, 10:23:20 AM, wrote:
> I bought a Barracuda Model 400 last October. My current setup is as follows:
Barracuda GW --->> Internal servers ---> Spamassassin server ---> Quarantine or
local delivery.
> Although there was a small percentage of spam being caught by a
| I pretty much at this time strictly use the Barracuda as a buffer to 'tone'
down
| traffic that would make our server drop to its knees. We are in process
| of getting a firewall in place and when that happens, the Barracuda will
| probably go bye..bye when I start building access lists.
Tha
We have a 400 as well. I don't think one can even compare SA
out-of-the-box and the Barracuda. I'm catching more Spam with the use of
SA with no rules loaded than what our Barracuda is tagging. I've taken
messages that came off the Barracuda and thew it through SA. SA scored
almost 2.5 points h
12 matches
Mail list logo
