John Wilcock wrote on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:31:07 +0100:
> Presumably because you didn't run sa-update while the ruleset was
> missing from the update...
Hm, it *is* missing. But maybe not from the compiled rules, well.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.co
Le 27/01/2010 22:31, Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:43:56 +0100:
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
sa-update files.
Now I understand. However, why am I not getting these warnings with a
spamassassin --lint?
Presumably becaus
At 10:02 AM Wednesday, 1/27/2010, John Wilcock wrote -=>
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:43:56 +0100:
> someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
> sa-update files.
Now I understand. However, why am I not getting these warnings with a
spamassassin --lint?
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http:/
g the same rules...
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: John Wilcock [mailto:j...@tradoc.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:03 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fuzzyocr and rule errors after upgrade to 3.3.0
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
>> Either someon
On 1/27/2010 1:02 PM, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the
sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears one of the bu
Le 27/01/2010 18:57, Justin Mason a écrit :
Either someone forgot to delete all these rules, or (more likely IMO)
someone forgot to include 72_active.cf and 80_additional.cf in the sa-update
files.
I think you're dead right. It appears one of the build scripts does
the wrong thing with the 3.3
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 16:43, John Wilcock wrote:
> To state the problem again, 463 of the scores in the 50_scores.cf from 3.3.0
> sa-update refer to rules that used to be in 72_active.cf or 80_additional.cf
> in 3.2.5, but that neither of these two files are anywhere to be found in
> the 3.3.0 s
Le 27/01/2010 17:31, Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:17 +0100:
Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
Do you want to say that you changed the score of 463 rules?
No, absolutely not. On this test box I haven't changed the scores of any
rules. There are absol
John Wilcock wrote on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:27:17 +0100:
> Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
Do you want to say that you changed the score of 463 rules?
> However, these two files don't seem to exist in
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.003000/updates_spamassassin_org/
Indeed, that's why you are getti
Le 27/01/2010 07:30, Ed Kasky a écrit :
Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
non-existent rule" errors? I ran sa-update after teand continue to get
a slew of them...
Me too... 463 of them, to be exact.
With the exception of ACCESSDB where the score is set to 0 anyway
At 03:31 AM Wednesday, 1/27/2010, you wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:23 -0800:
> FuzzyOcr
is it mentioned in the release notes? check back with the author of this
plugin if it is compatible with 3.3.0
> Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
> non-ex
Ed Kasky wrote on Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:23 -0800:
> FuzzyOcr
is it mentioned in the release notes? check back with the author of this
plugin if it is compatible with 3.3.0
> Also - is anyone else getting a lot of "warning: score set for
> non-existent rule" errors? I ran sa-update after tean
13 matches
Mail list logo
