On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 09:39, Frank M. Cook wrote:
SA shouldn't have this problem. However, the larger issue of whether or
not
any sort of SPAM filtering solution is considered legal is my concern.
this is an argument for simply rewriting the subject so that the user can
decide whether to
Hi,
there is a pretty good summary linked within the article :
http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/55210
This decision deals with filtering the email of a person who had left the
university and tried to stay in contact with his former co-workers. The
universitiy did not want thjis, and
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 9:06 AM
To: Kang, Joseph S.
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: German court rules e-mail blocking 'illegal'.
As far as i understood this is that mails must
get
I had the same thought when initially setting up our system. Our
university has pretty strict rules regarding content-filtering. I got
around it by having SA tag spam (using X-Spam-Status, no subject
re-write), then a procmail in each users folder autmagically puts these
into a Spam-folder.
Joe K. wrote:
Anyone know enough German (or is German) who can translate the
ruling that's linked in the above article?
As I am lacking the time for a full translation: the core of the
ruling is that the university had, under German law, no right to
block all mail originating from or sent to a
