On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 09:39, Frank M. Cook wrote: > > SA shouldn't have this problem. However, the larger issue of whether or > not > > any sort of SPAM filtering solution is considered legal is my concern. > > this is an argument for simply rewriting the subject so that the user can > decide whether to block the mail with local rules, or not.
Not necessarily, if the basis of the legal argument is confidentiality rather than failure to deliver. -- John Hardin Development and Technology group (Seattle) CRS Retail Systems, Inc. 3400 188th Street SW, Suite 185 Lynnwood, WA 98037 voice: (425) 672-1304 fax: (425) 672-0192 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.crsretail.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- If you smash a computer to bits with a mallet, that appears to count as encryption in the state of Nevada. - CRYPTO-GRAM 12/2001 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
