Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Sonntag, 25. September 2005 01:35 Steve wrote:
Sorry if this is really simple... any advice would be useful.
Not a lot, but SPF helps for that scenario. See http://spf.pobox.com
I agree; SPF is about the only defense. For the last few days an address in
one of
On Montag, 26. September 2005 15:37 Herb Martin wrote:
2) Some SMTP servers (but not enough) will check this
and disallow forged email from those authorized
servers
Where some is becoming bigger each month. I've seen a lot less
joe-jobbing tries with our domains during the
On Sonntag, 25. September 2005 01:35 Steve wrote:
Sorry if this is really simple... any advice would be useful.
Not a lot, but SPF helps for that scenario. See http://spf.pobox.com
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc --- it-management Michael Monnerie
// http://zmi.at Tel:
On 2005-09-24 20:08:03 -0400, Greg Allen wrote:
is that these are email address harvest attacks. And, another theory is that
spammers just don't care, the make email addresses up and sell them to other
spammers.
Some also have broken address harvesters: I continually get spam
for my domain,
Hello Steve,
Saturday, September 24, 2005, 4:35:41 PM, you wrote:
S I've recently had my domain targeted by a variety of offensive spammers
S pushing legally dubious stuff who have chosen my domain as the sent-from
S and/or reply to address in forged email.
S My simple question (which I admit
Steve wrote:
I've recently had my domain targeted by a variety of offensive spammers
pushing legally dubious stuff who have chosen my domain as the sent-from
and/or reply to address in forged email.
My simple question (which I admit is a bit spamassassin off-topic) is
what can I do about
If I understand your question correctly, the industry seems to be going this
way...
Postfix has this beautiful rule.
--
reject_unverified_recipient
Reject the request when mail to the RCPT TO address is known to bounce, or
when the recipient address destination is not reachable.