RE: Load Balancing with Postfix [and SpamAssassin]

2006-01-19 Thread Bowie Bailey
Alan Fullmer wrote: Yes they are rejecting mail for unknown users. However, currently I have it discard flagged spam, rather than reject it. Granted there are some that SA does not catch, therefore go into the whole limbo situation. I currently have no way for this machine to check the

RE: Load Balancing with Postfix [and SpamAssassin]

2006-01-18 Thread Bowie Bailey
Alan Fullmer wrote: The setup works, however I get so backlogged. For example, running a mailq as we speak, comes up with: 35918 Kbytes in 5257 Requests. It eventually gets through, and during the night it catches up. I am seeing delays up to 3 hours sometimes. I tail -f the maillog

RE: Load Balancing with Postfix [and SpamAssassin]

2006-01-18 Thread Alan Fullmer
- From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:44 PM To: 'SpamAssassin Users' Subject: RE: Load Balancing with Postfix [and SpamAssassin] Alan Fullmer wrote: The setup works, however I get so backlogged. For example, running a mailq as we speak, comes up

Re: Load Balancing with Postfix [and SpamAssassin]

2006-01-18 Thread Jason Philbrook
www.zoobuh.com -Original Message- From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:44 PM To: 'SpamAssassin Users' Subject: RE: Load Balancing with Postfix [and SpamAssassin] Alan Fullmer wrote: The setup works, however I get so backlogged

Re: Load Balancing with Postfix [and SpamAssassin]

2006-01-18 Thread Mike Jackson
I am wondering if anyone can direct me to any books/sites/etc regarding possibly running postfix on one or more servers accepting mail, processing with SA, then forwarding onto a 3rd machine. Currently my setup only includes one Postfix box, which does all of the mail filtering (with