On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:46:39PM +, night duke wrote:
> Hi i saw this errors at my mailog file.
>
> Does anyone know how can i fix them?
>
> Thanks
>
> Nightduke
>
>
> Nov 17 00:38:21 bcl00641 spamd[21558]: logger: removing stderr method
> Nov 17 00:38:21 bcl00641 spamd[21562]: Can't loc
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:32:26AM -0800, R Lists06 wrote:
> We have 3.17 and we do not use DCC right now
Ok.
> Also, I know what stderr is, yet stderr method?
> Jan 22 09:41:25 srv spamd[4100]: logger: removing stderr method
Logger will stop sending messages to stderr, such as debug, informatio
>I see that spamstats as well as sa-stats both read/process/parse/examine
>only maillog files I do not have a maillog file.
Thats one way to it.
A better way would be to use exim and the eximstats package.
That way you can count all the mail that exim blocks via RBL, sender
verify and other t
Hi;
Or even...
eximstats -ne -nr -nt -tnl -t30 -t_remote_users \
-pattern 'Total Mails REJECTED ' '/DENIED/' \
-pattern ' Blacklist Spamhaus ' '/www.spamhaus.org/' \
-html exim_mainlog.01 >stats.html
(Can you spot the deliberate error in my previous posting :)
rgds
Hi;
I see that spamstats as well as sa-stats both read/process/parse/examine
only maillog files I do not have a maillog file.
Thats one way to it.
A better way would be to use exim and the eximstats package.
That way you can count all the mail that exim blocks via RBL, sender
verify and othe
]
Sent: Thu 11/9/2006 5:29 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: MAILLOG
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> I hope I don't get bashed as it seems like this should be common knowledge,
> but with the significant increase in spam I need to PROVE to management
that
> SA is still doing a
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> I hope I don't get bashed as it seems like this should be common knowledge,
> but with the significant increase in spam I need to PROVE to management that
> SA is still doing a good job- (and that I'm doing mine)
Turn it off for an hour?
If you divert spam on a per-acc
