Title: Re: Porno
Okay, SA is working but was
about the routing. Did it ever pass through SA? Were there SA
headers in the original message? Did SA timeout because the machine is
overloaded and just return the original email back to the MTA
chain?
Granted SA thinks its spam but did SA
You might want to collect some additional information from the client
such as the headers. This is where I would start.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:54 AM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Porno
I have
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:54:13 -0500:
I have received complaints from two companies since yesterday about
messages with porno content getting through.
take the slipping message and run it thru spammassassin -D, then, and
only then, you know more.
Kai
--
Kai
Am Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2005 16:04 schrieb Robert Fitzpatrick:
Yes, I got a hold of one and it score 24 points using 'spamassassin -t'
and considered spam as only 5 points were required, but ended up in my
inbox. I am running amavisd-new with Postfix, how do I tell if
spamassassin is even
