, September 27, 2004 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
What/how are you guys gathering the data above? Thanks - John
--
Is Gushi a person or an entity?
Yes
-Bad Karma, August 25th 2001, Ezzi
At 05:01 AM Thursday, 9/30/2004, John Fleming wrote -=
- Original Message -
From: Ed Kasky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
John Rudd wrote:
1) Greet_Delay (default 30 seconds) -- had some brief false positives
with mac.com, but they fixed their MTA to stop being so impatient.
You might want to keep in mind that some MTAs that do callout
verification use 30 seconds as the default timeout, and if you make them
wait
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
At 09:52 AM Monday, 9/27/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote -=
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
On Monday, September 27, 2004, 9:52:41 AM, System Dan Mahoney wrote:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
list.dsbl.org
Spamhaus catches 90+% of them.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:10:30 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:52:41 -0400 (EDT), Dan Mahoney, System Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
I think it's a bad idea and don't do it
-Original Message-
From: Ed Kasky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 5:56 PM
To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
At 12:59 PM Monday, 9/27/2004, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote -=
Hi!
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via
Bob Apthorpe wrote:
I also firewall traffic from unassigned ARIN netspace - see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space.
I did this for a while, but somewhere along the line some of those
unassigned netblocks got assigned. I didn't discover this until about 6
months after one
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Kris Deugau wrote:
I did this for a while, but somewhere along the line some of those
unassigned netblocks got assigned. I didn't discover this until about 6
months after one corporate customer suddenly couldn't send mail to one
of their suppliers. Fortunately I had
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:47:20 -0400 Kris Deugau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Apthorpe wrote:
I also firewall traffic from unassigned ARIN netspace - see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space.
I did this for a while, but somewhere along the line some of those
unassigned
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:57:28 -0500, Bob Apthorpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi,
Hello.
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:10:30 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:52:41 -0400 (EDT), Dan Mahoney, System Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking
Chris Santerre wrote:
The question is always, did you block any legit mail...
The question is, can the person blocked read english? I send back a nice
little message saying you have been rejected due to listing on xx.com
RBL. And to send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be taken off the list.
At 07:29 AM Tuesday, 9/28/2004, Chris Santerre wrote -=
However, there are numerous people who don't read the nice little message.
They don't get passed the Rejected part.
In all I think I've had to fix maybe 5-6 customers who were blocked over the
coarse of 2.5 years. That's not bad! Want to know
spamhaus
-Original Message-
From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:53 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Preferred DNSBL
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
list.dsbl.org
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
cn.countries.nerd.dk
- --
Regards
Barry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Dan Mahoney, System Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/27/2004
11:52:41 AM:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
-Dan
--
Sorted by number of hits, the first three are by far the big hitters. Had
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org for a while
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
Just one: Spamhaus SBL+XBL
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications www.speed.net
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spamcop.net
njabl.org
spamhaus.org
ordb.org
recently took a lot of heat for using sorbs.net
As a person for whom the concept of DNS based blackholes is a little
troublesome I note it would not be wise for someone with corporate
customers to use a black hole that
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
At 09:52 AM Monday, 9/27/2004, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote -=
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
-Dan
Ed
. . . . . . . .
I distrust
Hey guys, as a quick survey, if you're blocking ips at the MTA level,
which are you using?
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
At 12:59 PM Monday, 9/27/2004, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote -=
Hi!
Rejects Since Sunday 4:00 am via rbls:
spamcop: 65
maps rbl+: 154
dsbl.org: 9
njabl.org: 18
spamhaus: 18
The question is always, did you block any legit mail...
Since this server supplies email for a limited number of users, we made
21 matches
Mail list logo
