RE: RBL Misfires?

2004-10-13 Thread Nate Schindler
> -Original Message- > From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 5:14 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: RBL Misfires? > > > It would be useful if you could forward the messages that falsely > trigg

Re: RBL Misfires?

2004-10-13 Thread Jeff Chan
On Tuesday, October 12, 2004, 10:28:06 AM, Nate Schindler wrote: > Once in a while, I notice a hit for an RBL-related test that seems a little > off. When I check for the existance of a record in the list, I can't find > one. Below is a match SA 3 found in an e-mail > from one of our dealers.

RE: RBL Misfires?

2004-10-12 Thread Nate Schindler
> -Original Message- > From: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:57 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: RBL Misfires? > Most likely scenario: > > 1. Someone erroneously reports the domain name to SURBL. >

Re: RBL Misfires?

2004-10-12 Thread Kelson
Nate Schindler wrote: Once in a while, I notice a hit for an RBL-related test that seems a little off. When I check for the existance of a record in the list, I can't find one. Below is a match SA 3 found in an e-mail from one of our dealers. I thought it was curious that they were listed, so

Re: RBL Misfires?

2004-10-12 Thread Matt Kettler
At 01:28 PM 10/12/2004, Nate Schindler wrote: Once in a while, I notice a hit for an RBL-related test that seems a little off. When I check for the existance of a record in the list, I can't find one. Below is a match SA 3 found in an e-mail from one of our dealers. I thought it was curious t