On Monday, 3. April 2006 16:35, Matt Kettler wrote:
Are the messages involved over 250k? Unless you pass -s with a different
size, spamc will bypass scanning for any message over 250k.
I was wondering about the same thing: I want to filter mails with large
attachments from a guy who is in my
Michael Frotscher wrote:
On Monday, 3. April 2006 16:35, Matt Kettler wrote:
Are the messages involved over 250k? Unless you pass -s with a different
size, spamc will bypass scanning for any message over 250k.
I was wondering about the same thing: I want to filter mails with large
On Thursday, 6. April 2006 18:29, Matt Kettler wrote:
If the guy is in your blacklist, can you just blacklist him at the MTA
layer?
Yes, that would probably best. I just wanted to have any blacklists etc. in
one place (i.e. spamassassin) and not two.
Erm, pre-process the message and feed
Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:36 AM
To: Michael Shuler
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Randomly Not Scanning Messages
Michael Shuler wrote:
I am using Postfix and Spam Assassin. For some reason some
messages
Michael Shuler wrote:
I am using Postfix and Spam Assassin. For some reason some messages that
are blatantly SPAM are not getting the X-Spam-Score added to them. They
show that they are received by Postfix (in the header) but they are not
scanned from what I can tell (X-Spam entries). When
